Rapid dynamic aeroelastic response analysis of the highly flexible wing with distributed propellers influence

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, X. [1 ]
Zhou, Z. [1 ]
Wang, Z. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Coll Aeronaut, Xian, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
geometric nonlinearity; distributed propellers; aeroelastic response; propeller effects; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; AIRCRAFT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1017/aer.2024.43
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A rapid nonlinear aeroelastic framework for the analysis of the highly flexible wing with distributed propellers is presented, validated and applied to investigate the propeller effects on the wing dynamic response and aeroelastic stability. In the framework, nonlinear beam elements based on the co-rotational method are applied for the large-deformation wing structure, and an efficient cylinder coordinate generation method is proposed for attached propellers at different position. By taking advantage of the relatively slow dynamics of the high-aspect-ratio wing, propeller wake is modeled as a quasi-steady skewed vortex cylinder with no updating process to reduce the high computational cost. Axial and tangential induced velocities are derived and included in the unsteady vortex lattice method. For the numerical cases explored, results indicate that large deformation causes thrust to produce wing negative torsion which limits the displacement oscillation, and slipstream mainly increases the response values. In addition, an improvement of flutter boundary is found with the increase of propeller thrust while slipstream brings a destabilising effect as a result of the increment of dynamic pressure and local lift. The great potential of distributed propellers in gust alleviation and flutter suppression of such aircraft is pointed out and the method as well as conclusions in this paper can provide further guidance.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A parametric analysis of the influence of the internal slug flow on the dynamic response of flexible marine risers
    Melendez Vasquez, Joseph Arthur
    Julca Avila, Juan Pablo
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 174 : 169 - 185
  • [42] Reduced order method for large flexible wing structure based on dynamic response data
    Xie C.
    Zhang D.
    An C.
    Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49 (06): : 1319 - 1330
  • [43] Experiment on dynamic response alleviation of a wing with variable-camber flexible trailing edge
    Zhang, Yuming
    Dai, Yuting
    Wei, Rukai
    Hu, Yating
    Yang, Chao
    Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024, 50 (10): : 3239 - 3249
  • [44] Distributed computing for the evaluation of the aeroelastic response and sensitivity analysis of flutter speed of the Messina Bridge
    Nieto, F
    Hernández, S
    Jurado, JA
    FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION AND MOVING BOUNDARY PROBLEMS, 2005, 84 : 465 - 476
  • [45] Aeroelastic Analysis of Wings in the Transonic Regime: Planform's Influence on the Dynamic Instability
    Chiarelli, Mario Rosario
    Bonomo, Salvatore
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
  • [46] Dynamic analysis of flexible manipulator arms with distributed viscoelastic damping
    Fan, ZJ
    Lu, BH
    Ku, CH
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1997, 119 (04): : 831 - 833
  • [47] Robust multidisciplinary analysis and optimization for conceptual design of flexible aircraft under dynamic aeroelastic constraints
    Saporito, Marco
    Da Ronch, Andrea
    Bartoli, Nathalie
    Defoort, Sebastien
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 138
  • [49] Static and Dynamic Response Analysis of Flexible Photovoltaic Mounts
    Lou, Yibing
    Zhang, Jian
    Pan, Yuxin
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (07)
  • [50] A Highly Flexible, Distributed Data Analysis Framework for Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems
    Peres, Ricardo Silva
    Rocha, Andre Dionisio
    Coelho, Andre
    Oliveira, Jose Barata
    SERVICE ORIENTATION IN HOLONIC AND MULTI-AGENT MANUFACTURING, 2017, 694 : 373 - 381