A Comparison of Different Protocols for the Extraction of Microbial DNA Inhabiting Synthetic Mars Simulant Soil

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Han [1 ,2 ]
Pijl, Agata [1 ]
Liu, Binbin [3 ]
Wamelink, Wieger [4 ]
Korthals, Gerard W. [5 ]
Costa, Ohana Y. A. [1 ]
Kuramae, Eiko E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Ecol NIOO KNAW, Dept Microbial Ecol, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Inst Environm Biol, Ecol & Biodivers, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Genet & Dev Biol, Ctr Agr Resources Res, 286 Huaizhong Rd, Shijiazhuang 050021, Peoples R China
[4] Wageningen Univ & Res, Biodivers & Policy, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Wageningen Univ & Res, Bioindicat & Plant Hlth, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
MGS-1; FastDNA SPIN Kit; DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit; bacteria community; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; BIOSIGNATURES; SEARCH; LIFE;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms12040760
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Compared with typical Earth soil, Martian soil and Mars simulant soils have distinct properties, including pH > 8.0 and high contents of silicates, iron-rich minerals, sulfates, and metal oxides. This unique soil matrix poses a major challenge for extracting microbial DNA. In particular, mineral adsorption and the generation of destructive hydroxyl radicals through cationic redox cycling may interfere with DNA extraction. This study evaluated different protocols for extracting microbial DNA from Mars Global Simulant (MGS-1), a Mars simulant soil. Two commercial kits were tested: the FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil ("MP kit") and the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit ("PowerSoil kit"). MGS-1 was incubated with living soil for five weeks, and DNA was extracted from aliquots using the kits. After extraction, the DNA was quantified with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer and used as the template for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and qPCR. The MP kit was the most efficient, yielding approximately four times more DNA than the PowerSoil kit. DNA extracted using the MP kit with 0.5 g soil resulted in 28,642-37,805 16S rRNA gene sequence reads and 30,380-42,070 16S rRNA gene copies, whereas the 16S rRNA gene could not be amplified from DNA extracted using the PowerSoil kit. We suggest that the FastDNA SPIN Kit is the best option for studying microbial communities in Mars simulant soils.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS FOR THE EXTRACTION OF MICROBIAL DNA FROM REEF CORALS
    Santos, H. F.
    Carmo, F. L.
    Leite, D. C. A.
    Jesus, H. E.
    De Carvalho Maalouf, P.
    Almeida, C.
    Soriano, A. U.
    Altomari, D.
    Suhett, L.
    Volaro, V.
    Valoni, E.
    Francisco, M.
    Vieira, J.
    Rocha, R.
    Sardinha, B. L.
    Mendes, L. B.
    Joao, R. R.
    Lacava, B.
    Jesus, R. F.
    Sebastian, G., V
    Pessoa, A.
    van Elsas, J. D.
    Rezende, R. P.
    Pires, D. O.
    Duarte, G.
    Castro, C. B.
    Rosado, A. S.
    Peixoto, R. S.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 43 (02) : 517 - 527
  • [2] Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for microbial communities from soil treated with biochar
    Leite, D. C. A.
    Balieiro, F. C.
    Pires, C. A.
    Madari, B. E.
    Rosado, A. S.
    Coutinho, H. L. C.
    Peixoto, R. S.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 45 (01) : 175 - 183
  • [3] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION PROTOCOLS ON DNA YEILD AND PURITY.
    Richard, Lucie
    HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 74 : 172 - 172
  • [4] A comparison of DNA/RNA extraction protocols for high-throughput sequencing of microbial communities
    Shaffer, Justin P.
    Marotz, Clarisse
    Belda-Ferre, Pedro
    Martino, Cameron
    Wandro, Stephen
    Estaki, Mehrbod
    Salido, Rodolfo A.
    Carpenter, Carolina S.
    Zaramela, Livia S.
    Minich, Jeremiah J.
    Bryant, MacKenzie
    Sanders, Karenina
    Fraraccio, Serena
    Ackermann, Gail
    Humphrey, Gregory
    Swafford, Austin D.
    Miller-Montgomery, Sandrine
    Knight, Rob
    BIOTECHNIQUES, 2021, 70 (03) : 149 - 159
  • [5] Performance comparison of different microbial DNA extraction methods on bird feces
    Hou, Xian
    Pan, Shengkai
    Lin, Zhenzhen
    Xu, Jiliang
    Zhan, Xiangjiang
    AVIAN RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (01):
  • [6] Performance comparison of different microbial DNA extraction methods on bird feces
    Xian Hou
    Shengkai Pan
    Zhenzhen Lin
    Jiliang Xu
    Xiangjiang Zhan
    Avian Research, 2021, 12 (02) : 247 - 254
  • [7] Comparison of Total DNA Extraction Methods for Microbial Community form Polluted Soil
    Tanase, Ana-Maria
    Mereuta, Ioana
    Chiciudean, Iulia
    Ionescu, Robertina
    Milea, Ligia
    Cornea, Calina Petruta
    Vassu, Tatiana
    Stoica, Ileana
    CONFERENCE AGRICULTURE FOR LIFE, LIFE FOR AGRICULTURE, 2015, 6 : 616 - 622
  • [8] Comparative analysis of microbial DNA extraction protocols for groundwater samples
    Purswani, Jessica
    Manuel Martin-Platero, Antonio
    Reboleiro-Rivas, Patricia
    Gonzalez-Lopez, Jesus
    Pozo, Clementina
    ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 416 (02) : 240 - 242
  • [9] The effect of soil sample size, for practical DNA extraction, on soil microbial diversity in different taxonomic ranks
    Morita, Hiroki
    Akao, Satoshi
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [10] Soil microbial diversity: an ISO standard for soil DNA extraction
    Laurent Philippot
    Cristina Abbate
    Antonio Bispo
    Thierry Chesnot
    Sara Hallin
    Philippe Lemanceau
    Kristina Lindström
    Pascal Pandard
    Esperanza Romero
    Michael Schloter
    Pascal Simonet
    Kornelia Smalla
    Berndt-Michael Wilke
    Imes Petric
    Fabrice Martin-Laurent
    Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010, 10 (7) : 1344 - 1345