Online Advertisement Allocation Under Customer Choices and Algorithmic Fairness

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaolong [1 ]
Rong, Ying [2 ]
Zhang, Renyu [3 ]
Zheng, Huan [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Inst Operat Res & Analyt, Singapore 117602, Singapore
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Data Driven Management Decis Making Lab, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, CUHK Business Sch, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
online advertising platform; assortment optimization; algorithmic fairness; online convex optimization; mean reverting; ASSORTMENT OPTIMIZATION; DISPLAY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2021.04091
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Advertising is a crucial revenue source for e -commerce platforms and a vital online marketing tool for their sellers. In this paper, we explore dynamic ad allocation with limited slots upon each customer's arrival for an e -commerce platform, where customers follow a choice model when clicking the ads. Motivated by the recent advocacy for the algorithmic fairness of online ad delivery, we adjust the value from advertising by a general fairness metric evaluated with the click-throughs of different ads and customer types. The original online ad -allocation problem is intractable, so we propose a novel stochastic program framework (called two -stage target -debt) ) that first decides the click -through targets and then devises an ad -allocation policy to satisfy these targets in the second stage. We show the asymptotic equivalence between the original problem, the relaxed click -through target optimization, and the fluid -approximation ( Fluid ) convex program. We also design a debt -weighted offer -set algorithm and demonstrate that, as long as the problem size scales to infinity, this algorithm is (asymptotically) optimal under the optimal first -stage click -through target. Compared with the Fluid heuristic and its resolving variants, our approach has better scalability and can deplete the ad budgets more smoothly throughout the horizon, which is highly desirable for the online advertising business in practice. Finally, our proposed model and algorithm help substantially improve the fairness of ad allocation for an online e -commerce platform without significantly compromising efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 843
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning Fairness under Constraints: A Decentralized Resource Allocation Game
    Zhu, Qinyun
    Oh, Jae C.
    2016 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA 2016), 2016, : 214 - 221
  • [22] A decision making model under uncertainty for advertisement allocation problem with multiple objectives
    Muneeb, Syed Mohd
    Siddiquei, Mohd Imran
    Dubey, Prince
    Kumar, Sunil
    Sustainable Operations and Computers, 2021, 2 : 230 - 234
  • [23] Optimal allocation of time in risky choices under opportunity costs
    Olschewski, Sebastian
    Mullett, Timothy L.
    Stewart, Neil
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 157
  • [24] Judging in the Dark: How Delivery Riders Form Fairness Perceptions Under Algorithmic Management
    Xiang, Yuan
    Du, Jing
    Zheng, Xue Ni
    Long, Li Rong
    Xie, Huan Yan
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2024,
  • [25] Online Resource Allocation under Horizon Uncertainty
    Balseiro S.
    Kroer C.
    Kumar R.
    Performance Evaluation Review, 2023, 51 (01): : 63 - 64
  • [26] Structure of solutions of resource allocation problems under general fairness constraints
    Boche, Holger
    Naik, Siddharth
    Schubert, Martin
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 5372 - +
  • [27] Algorithmic trading for online portfolio selection under limited market liquidity
    Ha, Youngmin
    Zhang, Hai
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 286 (03) : 1033 - 1051
  • [28] Influence Maximization under Fairness Budget Distribution in Online Social Networks
    Bich-Ngan T Nguyen
    Phuong N H Pham
    Van-Vang Le
    Snasel, Vaclav
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (22)
  • [29] LINEAR VERSUS NONLINEAR ALLOCATION RULES IN RISK SHARING UNDER FINANCIAL FAIRNESS
    Schumacher, Johannes M.
    ASTIN BULLETIN, 2018, 48 (03): : 995 - 1024
  • [30] Fact, fiction, and fairness: Resource allocation under the Ryan White CARE Act
    Martin, Erika G.
    Pollack, Harold A.
    Paltiel, A. David
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (04) : 1103 - 1112