Corporate social responsibility and forward default risk under firm and industry heterogeneity

被引:2
|
作者
Mushafiq, Muhammad [1 ,2 ]
Prusak, Blazej [2 ,3 ]
Markiewicz, Magdalena [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Gdansk Univ Technol, Gdansk, Poland
[2] Gdansk Univ Technol, Fac Management & Econ, Traugutta 79, PL-80233 Gdansk, Poland
[3] Gdansk Univ Technol, Finance Dept, Gdarisk, Poland
[4] Univ Gdansk, Fac Econ, Int Business Dept, Gdansk, Poland
[5] Univ Gdansk, Fac Econ, Dev & Cooperat Social & Econ Environm, Gdansk, Poland
[6] Univ Gdansk, Fac Econ, Armii Krajowej 119, PL-81824 Sopot, Poland
关键词
corporate social responsibility; forward default risk; heterogeneity effect; firm; industry; FINANCIAL DISTRESS; CSR; PERFORMANCE; PHILANTHROPY; SIZE; ENGAGEMENT; REPUTATION; CHINA; AGE;
D O I
10.15678/EBER.2023.120105
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of corporate social responsibility on forward default risk (FDR) under the setting of firm and industry heterogeneity. Research Design & Methods: This study evaluated the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on FDR using the data of 497 companies from 2007-2021 in the S&P 500 index, taking into account firm and industry heterogeneity aspects. This study utilized instrumental variable regression using the generalized method of moments (IV-GMM) estimation technique which is robust for controlling the pertinent issue of endogeneity. Findings: This study found a negative relationship between CSR and FDR in the full sample. From the firm size aspect, this study found that CSR is more effective in mitigating FDR in large -cap firms than in mid -cap firms. Firm age heterogeneity exhibited a distinct behaviour, as young and middle-aged firms had a stronger impact on FDR management in comparison to old firms. Industry heterogeneity showed that industries with higher customer interaction have a higher impact on corporate social responsibility to control FDR. Industries with lower customer interaction have a lower impact on corporate social responsibility and FDR. Implications & Recommendations: We proposed some policy recommendations based on the findings in the context of firm and industry heterogeneity. Especially the management of mid -cap and young corporations should improve the CSR policy to enhance CSR performance which would lead to stabilized protection against FDR. Similarly, consumer -intensive industries should also focus on enhancing CSR initiatives to decrease FDR. Non -consumer -intensive industries should focus on enhancing CSR policy and at the same time pay particular attention to communicating CSR results to end consumers to reduce FDR. Contribution & Value Added: This study is the first to explore CSR's impact on financial parameters under heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does size matter? Corporate social responsibility and firm performance in the restaurant industry
    Youn, Hyewon
    Hua, Nan
    Lee, Seoki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2015, 51 : 127 - 134
  • [42] Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Idiosyncratic Risk in Different Market States
    Chen, Roger C. Y.
    Hung, Shih-Wei
    Lee, Chen-Hsun
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (04) : 642 - 658
  • [43] Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Controversial Versus Noncontroversial Industries
    Eriandani, Rizky
    Wijaya, Liliana Inggrit
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (03): : 953 - 965
  • [44] The combined effects of innovation and corporate social responsibility on firm financial risk
    Liu, Bai
    Ju, Tao
    Gao, Simon S. S.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT & ACCOUNTING, 2021, 32 (03) : 283 - 310
  • [45] Effect of managerial ability toward corporate social responsibility on enterprise default risk
    Chen, Huihui
    Ho, Kung-Cheng
    Zhang, Ming
    Zhang, Qidi
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 54
  • [46] Corporate social responsibility's influence on firm risk and firm performance: the mediating role of firm reputation
    Rehman, Zia ur
    Khan, Asad
    Rahman, Asim
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (06) : 2991 - 3005
  • [47] Internationalization and corporate social responsibility in the restaurant industry: risk perspective
    Jung, Soyeon
    Kim, Joon Ho
    Kang, Kyung Ho
    Kim, Bora
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2018, 26 (07) : 1105 - 1123
  • [48] Inhibiting or promoting: The industry heterogeneity of board interlocks and corporate social responsibility in China
    Wang, Shiquan
    Gao, Sheng
    Fu, Yao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 419
  • [49] Corporate social responsibility versus corporate shareholder responsibility: A family firm perspective
    Abeysekera, Amal P.
    Fernando, Chitru S.
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 61
  • [50] Does firm strategy influence corporate social responsibility and firm performance? Evidence from the tourism industry
    Uyar, Ali
    Koseoglu, Mehmet Ali
    Kuzey, Cemil
    Karaman, Abdullah S.
    TOURISM ECONOMICS, 2023, 29 (05) : 1272 - 1301