Return Period of Low Water Periods in the River Rhine

被引:2
|
作者
van Brenk, Saskia H. [1 ]
Lokin, Lieke R. [1 ,2 ]
Warmink, Jord J. [1 ]
Hulscher, Suzanne J. M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] HKV, Lelystad, Netherlands
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH IAHR WORLD CONGRESS | 2022年
关键词
Climate change; Droughts; Retum periods;
D O I
10.3850/IAHR-39WC2521716X20221485
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this study is to quantify the return period for the 2018 low flows and determine the effect of climate change on low flow return periods on the Rhine at Lobith. Low flow return periods are important for shipping applications or risk assessments concerning water availability and to prevent salinisation. Discharge data from 1901 to 2020 are used and gained from Rijkswaterstaat, the Dutch water authority. Several durations are taken into account: 1, 7, 30. 90 and 180 days. An average discharge over this duration gives the severity of the low flow. Results of the 95% confidence interval show that a Weibull fit the best fit for all the different durations. Furthermore, the LFFCs show little difference between the 1 and 7 day fit, but generally the larger the duration the higher the discharges. A 1 day discharge of 732 m3/s, which was the annual minimum of 2018, is likely to occur once every 17.6 years. However, due to climate change in 2085 this can occur once every 6.5 to 22.6 years based on the KNMI 14 scenarios and the GRADE model. A 180 day average discharge of 1017 m3/s, which was the annual minimum of 2018, is likely to occur once every 29.5 years. However, due to climate change in 2085 this can occur once every 35.3 to 179.5 years based on the KNMI 14 scenarios. The method used can be applied to other rivers to find return periods for low flows, as this is currently not commonly found.
引用
收藏
页码:6123 / 6132
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ENDOSULFAN IN RHINE RIVER
    GREVE, PA
    WIT, SL
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1971, 43 (12): : 2338 - &
  • [32] Reintroducing Atlantic salmon in the river Rhine for decades: Why did it not result in the return of a viable population?
    van Rijssel, J. C.
    Breukelaar, A. W.
    de Leeuw, J. J.
    van Puijenbroek, M. E. B.
    Schilder, K.
    Schrimpf, A.
    Vriese, F. T.
    Winter, H. V.
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 40 (07) : 1164 - 1182
  • [33] PESTICIDES IN THE RIVER RHINE
    BRAUCH, HJ
    ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA, 1993, 21 (03): : 137 - 144
  • [34] SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT OF ZOOPLANKTON OF THE LOWER RIVER RHINE DURING THE PERIOD 1987-1991
    VANZANTEN, B
    VANDIJK, GM
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 29 (03) : 49 - 51
  • [35] Response of the lower Rhine River to climate change over the period 2010-2050
    Arbos, C. Ylla
    Blom, A.
    Schielen, R. M. J.
    RIVER FLOW 2022, 2024, : 1008 - 1013
  • [36] Dismissing return periods!
    Serinaldi, Francesco
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2015, 29 (04) : 1179 - 1189
  • [37] Isolation and sequencing of a novel inovirus, "Copypasta," from Rhine River water
    Javorcik, P. Nathael
    Harms, Alexander
    MICROBIOLOGY RESOURCE ANNOUNCEMENTS, 2024, 13 (02):
  • [38] Structure of the heterotrophic flagellate community in the water column of the River Rhine (Germany)
    Weitere, M
    Arndt, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROTISTOLOGY, 2003, 39 (03) : 287 - 300
  • [39] WATER-QUALITY CONTROL STATION RHINE RIVER - MAYENCE WIESBADEN
    KALWEIT, H
    PROGRESS IN WATER TECHNOLOGY, 1978, 9 (5-6): : 167 - 172
  • [40] INVESTIGATIONS ON THE TOXICITY OF WEAKLY POLAR ORGANIC POLLUTANTS IN RHINE RIVER WATER
    BOHNSACK, G
    HAMBURGER, B
    VOM WASSER, 1982, 58 : 35 - 41