Brain protective effect of dexmedetomidine vs propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation in non-brain injured patients

被引:1
|
作者
Yuan, Hong-Xun [1 ]
Zhang, Li-Na [2 ]
Li, Gang [1 ,3 ]
Qiao, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Intens Care Unit, Int Hosp, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Affiliated Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Cent Operating Room, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Int Hosp, Intens Care Unit, 1 Life Pk Rd,Zhongguancun Life Sci Pk, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY | 2024年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Propofol; Sedation; Prolonged mechanical ventilation; Brain protective; MIDAZOLAM;
D O I
10.5498/wjp.v14.i3.370
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Dexmedetomidine and propofol are two sedatives used for long-term sedation. It remains unclear whether dexmedetomidine provides superior cerebral protection for patients undergoing long-term mechanical ventilation. AIM To compare the neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients without brain injury. METHODS Patients who underwent mechanical ventilation for > 72 h were randomly assigned to receive sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol. The Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) was used to evaluate sedation effects, with a target range of -3 to 0. The primary outcomes were serum levels of S100-beta and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) every 24 h. The secondary outcomes were remifentanil dosage, the proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation, and the time and frequency of RASS scores within the target range. RESULTS A total of 52 and 63 patients were allocated to the dexmedetomidine group and propofol group, respectively. Baseline data were comparable between groups. No significant differences were identified between groups within the median duration of study drug infusion [52.0 (IQR: 36.0-73.5) h vs 53.0 (IQR: 37.0-72.0) h, P = 0.958], the median dose of remifentanil [4.5 (IQR: 4.0-5.0) mu g/kg/h vs 4.6 (IQR: 4.0-5.0) mu g/kg/h, P = 0.395], the median percentage of time in the target RASS range without rescue sedation [85.6% (IQR: 65.8%-96.6%) vs 86.7% (IQR: 72.3%-95.3), P = 0.592], and the median frequency within the target RASS range without rescue sedation [72.2% (60.8%-91.7%) vs 73.3% (60.0%-100.0%), P = 0.880]. The proportion of patients in the dexmedetomidine group who required rescue sedation was higher than in the propofol group with statistical significance (69.2% vs 50.8%, P = 0.045). Serum S100-beta and NSE levels in the propofol group were higher than in the dexmedetomidine group with statistical significance during the first six and five days of mechanical ventilation, respectively (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Dexmedetomidine demonstrated stronger protective effects on the brain compared to propofol for long-term mechanical ventilation in patients without brain injury.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sedation and analgesia from prolonged pain and stress during mechanical ventilation in preterm infants: is dexmedetomidine an alternative to current practice?
    Ojha, Shalini
    Abramson, Janine
    Dorling, Jon
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [22] Sedation With Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Burn Patients Reduced Delirium During Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
    Stangaciu, Bianca
    Tsotsolis, Stavros
    Papadopoulou, Sophia
    Lavrentieva, Athina
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [23] Lung Protective Ventilation in Brain-Injured Patients: Low Tidal Volumes or Airway Pressure Release Ventilation?
    Garg, Ravi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROANAESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 8 (02) : 118 - 122
  • [24] Intraoperative mechanical ventilation in patients with non-injured lungs: time to talk about tailored protective ventilation?
    Ball, Lorenzo
    Pelosi, Paolo
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (01)
  • [25] Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation on Postextubation Brain-Injured Patients: Looking for Evidence?
    Bhattacharya, Dipasri
    Esquinas, Antonio M.
    Mandal, Mohanchandra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 208 (11) : 1244 - 1245
  • [26] Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury
    Yang, Guanyu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2025, 211 (01) : 136 - 137
  • [27] THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF VENTILATION IN CHANGES OF ICP OF BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS
    ABBUSHI, W
    HERKT, G
    SPECKNER, E
    BIRK, M
    INTENSIVBEHANDLUNG, 1981, 6 (03): : 107 - 116
  • [28] The effect of dexmedetomidine on agitation during weaning of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients
    Shehabi, Y.
    Nakae, H.
    Hammond, N.
    Bass, F.
    Nicholson, L.
    Chen, J.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2010, 38 (01) : 82 - 90
  • [29] The Impact of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation on Overall Survival in Patients With Surgically Treated Brain Metastases
    Schuss, Patrick
    Schaefer, Niklas
    Bode, Christian
    Borger, Valeri
    Eichhorn, Lars
    Giordano, Frank A.
    Guresir, Erdem
    Heimann, Muriel
    Ko, Yon-Dschun
    Landsberg, Jennifer
    Lehmann, Felix
    Potthoff, Anna-Laura
    Radbruch, Alexander
    Schaub, Christina
    Schwab, Katjana S.
    Weller, Johannes
    Vatter, Hartmut
    Herrlinger, Ulrich
    Schneider, Matthias
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [30] Cost-Effectiveness of Benzodiazepine Vs. Non-Benzodiazepine Sedation During Mechanical Ventilation
    Bioc, Justin
    Magee
    Cucchi, James
    Fraser, Gilles
    Dasta, Joseph
    Edwards, Roger
    Devlin John
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (12)