Comparison of 3D and 2D laparoscopy: Initial experience of perioperative outcomes and clinical assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Li [1 ]
Bu, Guosen [2 ]
Zhao, Jing [1 ]
La, Xiaolin [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ma, Cailing [6 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Ctr Reprod Med, Urumqi 830054, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Internal Med Neurol, Urumqi 830054, Peoples R China
[3] Res Ctr Integrated Prevent & Treatment Reprod Dis, Urumqi 830054, Peoples R China
[4] Xinjiang Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xinjiang Clin Res Ctr Reprod Immunol, Urumqi 830054, Peoples R China
[5] Xinjiang Med Univ, State Key Lab Pathogenesis Prevent & Treatment Hig, Urumqi 830054, Peoples R China
[6] Xinjiang Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gynaecol, Urumqi 830054, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopy; Three dimension; Cervical cancer; Pelvic lymphadenectomy; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; HIGH-DEFINITION; PERFORMANCE; SURGERY; VISION; PROFICIENCY; CANCER; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102754
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study was designed to compare three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy and conventional twodimensional (2D) laparoscopy in surgical performance and clinical assessment during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (LRHND) for treating early-stage cervical cancer. Material and methods: In this study, we included 67 consecutive patients underwent LRHND for treating earlystage cervical cancer by the experienced laparoscopic surgeons between August 2018 and December 2020. amongst these patients, 32 patients underwent 3D laparoscopy (2D group) and 35 patients underwent 2D laparoscopy (2D group). Demographic data, clinical and surgical parameters were obtained from each patient. An end-of-operation questionnaire was administered regarding subjective perception of 3D laparoscopy system. Results: Patient characteristics, including age, BMI, FIGO stage, and histology, were comparable between the two groups. Compared with 2D imaging system, 3D system significantly shortened the operation time, especially bilateral lymph node dissection time. Blood loss was lower in 3D group compared with 2D group. There were no significant differences regarding pelvic nodes retrieved, incidence of complications, hospital stay, the recovery time of bowel, abdominal drainage fluid, hospitalization costs and visual symptoms. In addition, 3D system significantly improved depth perception and precision, and reduced surgical strain and eye strain for surgeon. No statistical difference was observed in visual symptoms and adverse events between the two groups. The surgeon was more willing to accept 3D laparoscopy. Conclusion: The 3D laparoscopy is safe, feasible and comfortable, with obvious advantage in depth perception, precision and surgical strain. It triggered no increase in the complications and adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion
    Steven Kim
    Audriene May
    Heidi Ryan
    Adnan Mohsin
    Shawn Tsuda
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 4625 - 4630
  • [22] Combining Visual Cues with Interactions for 3D–2D Registration in Liver Laparoscopy
    Yamid Espinel
    Erol Özgür
    Lilian Calvet
    Bertrand Le Roy
    Emmanuel Buc
    Adrien Bartoli
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 48 : 1712 - 1727
  • [23] A comparison of 2D and 3D simulations of the River Blackwater
    Barrett, Lawrence
    Wright, Nigel G.
    Sterling, Mark
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2011, 164 (04) : 217 - 232
  • [24] Comparison of 2D and 3D images of fractures in a Vertisol
    Moreau, E
    Velde, B
    Terribile, F
    GEODERMA, 1999, 92 (1-2) : 55 - 72
  • [25] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [26] COMPARISON OF SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF 2D AND 3D ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    BELOHLAVEK, M
    FOLEY, DA
    GREENLEAF, JF
    SEWARD, JB
    CIRCULATION, 1993, 88 (04) : 350 - 350
  • [27] Comparison of 3D and 2D menus for cell phones
    Kim, Kyungdoh
    Proctor, Robert W.
    Salvendy, Gavriel
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (05) : 2056 - 2066
  • [28] Comparison of random surfaces 2D and 3D parameters
    Pawlus, P.
    Reizer, R.
    Annals of DAAAM for 2006 & Proceedings of the 17th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON MECHATRONICS AND ROBOTICS, 2006, : 293 - 294
  • [29] Comparison of perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes between 3D and 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Shuai, Hui
    Duan, Xi
    Wu, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [30] Comparison of 2D and 3D FEA of a BLDC motor
    Wang, S
    Kang, J
    Park, K
    Yoon, H
    Jang, G
    COMPEL-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATION AND MATHEMATICS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2000, 19 (02) : 529 - 537