Assessment of cone beam computed tomography use in pediatric and adolescent patients: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Nahir, Canan Bayraktar [1 ]
Citir, Mesude [2 ]
Colak, Sefa [3 ]
Keldal, Goksal [3 ]
机构
[1] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Muhittin Fisunoglu Caddesi,Omcalik Sokak,Ali Sevki, TR-60600 Tokat, Turkiye
[2] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Muhittin Fisunoglu Caddesi,Omcalik Sokak,Ali Sevki, TR-60030 Tokat, Turkiye
[3] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Muhittin Fisunoglu Caddesi,Omcalik Sokak,Ali Sevki, TR-60030 Tokat, Turkiye
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Cone beam computed tomography; Oral pathology; Orthognathic surgery; Pediatric dentistry; SUPERNUMERARY TEETH; MAXILLARY; CT; DENTISTRY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-04813-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dentomaxillofacial diagnostics in pediatric dentistry is expanding and concerns have been raised about the radiation risks associated with this imaging modality, especially for children. Dentomaxillofacial paediatric imaging: an investigation towards low-dose radiation induced risks (DIMITRA) is a multidisciplinary project focused on optimizing CBCT exposure for children and adolescents. This study aims to clarify the indications behind CBCT scans in children aligned with DIMITRA's recommendations.MethodsFor each CBCT examination, data were collected on patient age at the time of the CBCT examination, gender, reason for request, referring department, CBCT-requested region, and the field of view (FOV) dimension of imaging. The CBCT indications were categorized under six headings according to an adaptation of the DIMITRA project recommendations: impacted teeth, dentoalveolar trauma, orofacial clefts, dental anomalies, bone pathology, syndromes. Indications not categorized in DIMITRA were recorded below the heading "other".ResultsThe most common indication was the "other" category (34.8%), which included implant, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, orofacial anomalies, foreign object and root canal morphology. The least common indication was "orofacial cleft" (1.9%) and no requests were made for cases related to syndromes. Detection of supernumerary tooth in dental anomalies (68.6%) was the most common CBCT indication, while dentigerous cysts (37.6%) were among the most common CBCT indication in bone pathologies and orofacial anomalies (68.1%) in the other category. The most common size was External Center (15 x 15 cm) (27%) and the least common size was Both Arches/small (8 x 8 cm) (0.4%) when the CBCT FOV was analysed.ConclusionsAlthough the option of a smaller FOV size was available, the larger FOV size that included the both jaws were most frequently used. When justifying CBCT requests, patient-specific radiation dose risks should be considered and specific guidelines should be followed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Velopharyngeal Closure Function With 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography and Assessment of Radiation Exposure in Pediatric Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Kobayashi, Yoshikazu
    Kobayashi, Masanao
    Kanamori, Daisuke
    Fujii, Naoko
    Kataoka, Yumi
    Satoh, Koji
    Sano, Yoshimi
    Yoshioka, Satoshi
    Tateya, Ichiro
    Toyama, Hiroshi
    Matsuo, Koichiro
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (02): : 141 - 148
  • [42] The occurrence of dental implant malpositioning and related factors: A cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography survey
    Safi, Yaser
    Amid, Reza
    Zadbin, Fariba
    Ahsaie, Mitra Ghazizadeh
    Mortazavi, Hamed
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2021, 51 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [43] Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography for Detecting Apical Root Resorption in Retention Phase of Orthodontic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Pereira, Sonia A.
    Corte-Real, Ana
    Melo, Ana
    Magalhaes, Linda
    Lavado, Nuno
    Santos, Joao Miguel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (05)
  • [44] Correlations of temporomandibular joint morphology and position using cone-beam computed tomography and dynamic functional analysis in orthodontic patients: A cross-sectional study
    Xu, Bin
    Park, Jung-Jin
    Kim, Seong-Hun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 54 (05) : 325 - 341
  • [45] Accidental Pathological Findings in Asymptomatic Maxillary Sinuses in Patients Referred for Head and Neck Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-sectional Study Analysis
    Chandran, Ajay
    Patil, Manisha B.
    Nachiappan, S.
    Panwar, Pratyaksha Singh
    Nagarajappa, Anil Kumar
    Kolte, Deepak R.
    Babu, J. Suresh
    Swarnalatha, C.
    Nayyar, Abhishek Singh
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SIGNALS & SENSORS, 2022, 12 (02): : 138 - 144
  • [46] A Two-Year Retrospective Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Indications in Pediatric, Adolescent and Adult Patients
    Arslan, Zeynep Betul
    Tugutlu, Esra Ceren
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY INDONESIA, 2023, 30 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [47] Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions
    Swasty, Denise
    Lee, Janice
    Huang, John C.
    Maki, Koutaro
    Gansky, Stuart A.
    Hatcher, David
    Miller, Arthur J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (04) : e377 - e389
  • [48] Cross-Sectional Imaging - Computed Tomography
    Rothenberg, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3963 - 3964
  • [49] Diagnostic Study of Mandibular Cortical Index Classification Using Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Findings: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study
    Seki, Keisuke
    Yoshino, Tona
    Ogisawa, Shouhei
    Arai, Yushi
    Tonogi, Morio
    Iinuma, Toshimitsu
    REPORTS, 2023, 6 (04)
  • [50] The use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics
    Patel, S.
    Horner, K.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2009, 42 (09) : 755 - 756