Comparative Analysis of CO2 Emission Accounting Methods for Coal-fired Power Plants

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Hongwen [1 ]
Ban, Mingfei [1 ]
Sun, Yaofei [1 ]
Liu, Yiqi [1 ]
Chen, Qichao [2 ]
Song, Wenlong [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Forestry Univ, Dept Comp & Control Engn, Harbin, Peoples R China
[2] State Grid Beijing Elect Power Co Ltd, Econ & Technol Res Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
黑龙江省自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
calculating CO2 emissions; data acquisition costs; carbon trading cost; comprehensive accounting costs;
D O I
10.1109/ACFPE59335.2023.10455313
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Energy combustion is the primary source of CO2 emissions in China. Coal-fired power generation, in particular, is a significant consumer of energy. To achieve the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, it is crucial for coal-fired power plants to select suitable methods for calculating CO2 emissions and accounting for them. Starting from the carbon emission sources of coal-fired power plants and using the principle of least squares, qualitative and quantitative analyses, different methods for calculating CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants are analyzed. A comparative analysis model is established to compare the calculation results, data acquisition costs, carbon trading cost, and comprehensive accounting costs of different CO2 emission accounting methods. The computational results illustrate that the CO2 emissions derived from the material balance method closely approximate the measurements obtained through continuous monitoring techniques, with the data acquisition costs and carbon trading costs stemming from carbon emission characteristic coefficient calculations being minimal.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 314
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coal-Fired Power Plants Alternative Petcoke Fired Power Plants
    Ozcelik, Ozlem
    Boran, Kurtulus
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2016, 19 (04): : 531 - 535
  • [42] Carbon dioxide emission tallies for 210 U.S. coal-fired power plants: A comparison of two accounting methods
    Quick, Jeffrey C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [43] Coal ... Coal-fired power plants for the future
    Heyn, Klaus
    Brennstoff-Waerme-Kraft, 1999, 51 (5-6): : 18 - 24
  • [44] Modeling and performance analysis of subcritical and supercritical coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture
    Dumitru Cebrucean
    Viorica Cebrucean
    Ioana Ionel
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2020, 22 : 153 - 169
  • [45] Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power plants and sensitivity analysis of CO2 emissions from power generation side
    Yin, Libao
    Liao, Yanfen
    Zhou, Lianjie
    Wang, Zhao
    Ma, Xiaoqian
    2017 2ND ASIA CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ACPEE 2017), 2017, 199
  • [46] Modeling and performance analysis of subcritical and supercritical coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture
    Cebrucean, Dumitru
    Cebrucean, Viorica
    Ionel, Ioana
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 22 (01) : 153 - 169
  • [47] Coal-Fired Power Plants of Japan
    A. N. Tugov
    I. V. Artemeva
    Power Technology and Engineering, 2024, 58 (4) : 644 - 653
  • [48] Analysis and optimization of CO2 capture in an existing coal-fired power plant in China
    Xu, Gang
    Yang, Yong-ping
    Ding, Jie
    Li, Shoucheng
    Liu, Wenyi
    Zhang, Kai
    ENERGY, 2013, 58 : 117 - 127
  • [49] Analysis of CO2 Emissions in the Whole Production Process of Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Wang, Han
    Fu, Zhenghui
    Wang, Shulan
    Zhang, Wenjie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [50] Economics of CO2 capture from a coal-fired power plant -: A sensitivity analysis
    Singh, D
    Croiset, E
    Douglas, PL
    Douglas, MA
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1735 - 1738