Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for radiation dose in paediatric interventional cardiology procedures in Brazil

被引:0
|
作者
Yagui, Akemi [1 ]
Schelin, Hugo [1 ]
Mello, Rosiane [1 ]
Andrade, Diancarlos [1 ]
Vosiak, Paula [1 ]
Denyak, Valeriy [2 ,3 ]
Filipov, Danielle [3 ]
Paschuk, Sergei [3 ]
Khoury, Helen [4 ]
Ubeda, Carlos [5 ]
机构
[1] Pele Pequeno Principe Res Inst, Pequeno Principe Fac, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
[2] Natl Sci Ctr Kharkov Inst Phys & Technol, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[3] Fed Univ Technol, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
[5] Tarapaca Univ, Hlth Sci Fac, Med Technol Dept, Arica, Chile
关键词
Interventional cardiology; Paediatric; Radiation dose; Diagnostic reference levels; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111577
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Diagnostic and therapeutic interventional cardiology procedures are essential tools for evaluating congenital pathologies in paediatric patients. However, these procedures may expose patients to high levels of ionizing radiation. In this paper, we present the results of the radiation doses received by patients undergoing interventional cardiac procedures at a paediatric hospital in Brazil, aiming to establish local Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL). The data were collected over a period of three years (2019-2022), and 148 procedures were analyzed, comprising 53% male (78) and 47% female (70) patients. These procedures included both diagnostic (59%) and therapeutic (41%) cardiac catheterization interventions. The average patient weight was 21.4 +/- 1.7 kg (2.0-112.0 kg), with an average age of 5.3 +/- 0.4 years (0.0-17.1 years). Comprehensive data for each procedure were extracted from Radiation Dose Structure Reports generated by the equipment. The results showed significant differences between diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and the DRL values were estimated considering the age and weight of the patients. The DRL values correspond to the 3rd quartile of the dose distribution for each group. The following local DRL values were estimated, considering the patient's ages. For diagnostic procedures, the P-KA defined according to the age groups <1, 1-5, 5-10, 10-15, and >15 years were respectively: 1.4, 2.8, 3.1, 4.3 and 12.0 Gy cm(2). For therapeutic procedures, the DRL values for patients with the same ages were: 2.0, 3.7, 5.4, 7.4, and 30.9 Gy cm(2). For the total procedures, the P-KA values were 1.7, 3.2, 4.9, 6.6, and 24.5 Gy cm(2), respectively. The suggested local DRL values for weight groups (<5, 5-15, 15-30, 30-50, and 50-80 kg) for P-KA in diagnostic procedures were: 1.3, 2.2, 3.2, 4.1, and 7.9 Gy cm(2), respectively. For therapeutic procedures, the P-KA values were 1.1, 2.7, 5.4, 5.5, and 30.9 Gy cm(2), respectively. For the total procedures, the P-KA values were 1.25, 2.5, 4.6, 4.2, and 18.3 Gy cm(2), respectively. For establishing P-KA DRL, patient weight was found to be preferable over age, whereas for K-a,K-r, both approaches yielded nearly identical results.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric interventional cardiology
    McFadden, S.
    Hughes, C.
    D'Helft, C. I.
    McGee, A.
    Rainford, L.
    Brennan, P. C.
    McCrum-Gardner, E.
    Winder, R. J.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2013, 19 (04) : 295 - 301
  • [2] An audit of patient radiation doses during interventional cardiology procedures in Uttarakhand, India, and establishment of local diagnostic reference levels
    Uniyal, Satish C.
    Singh, Vikram
    Rawat, Anurag
    Gururani, Kunal
    Belwal, Chandra Mohan
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 17 (02) : 476 - 487
  • [3] Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Pediatric Interventional Cardiology Procedures in Argentina
    Azcurra, Patricia
    Leyton, Fernando
    Lucini, Victorio
    Rivarola, Marcelo
    Trentacoste, Luis
    Marques, Adela
    Chiabrando, Juan
    Seropian, Ignacio
    Mundo, Nicolas
    Ubeda, Carlos
    Agatiello, Carla
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (12):
  • [4] Towards the definition of Institutional diagnostic reference levels in paediatric interventional cardiology procedures in Greece
    Kottou, S.
    Kollaros, N.
    Plemmenos, C.
    Mastorakou, I.
    Apostolopoulou, S. C.
    Tsapaki, V.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 46 : 52 - 58
  • [5] Paediatric interventional cardiology in Costa Rica: diagnostic reference levels and estimation of population dose
    Ubeda, C.
    Vano, E.
    Salazar, L.
    Retana, V
    Santos, F.
    Gutierrez, R.
    Manterola, C.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2018, 38 (01) : 218 - 228
  • [6] Local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric non-cardiac interventional radiology procedures
    Belen Morcillo, Ana
    Alejo, Luis
    Huerga, Carlos
    Bayon, Jose
    Obesso, Alba
    Corredoira, Eva
    Ricardo Novo, Joan
    Hernandez, Teresa
    Dolores Ponce, Maria
    Fernandez, Lucia
    Rodriguez, Ricardo
    Garzon, Gonzalo
    Vano, Eliseo
    Guibelalde, Eduardo
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 72 : 1 - 6
  • [7] Radiation doses in paediatric interventional cardiology procedures
    Tsapaki, Virginia
    Kottou, Sofia
    Korniotis, Sarantis
    Nikolaki, Niki
    Rammos, Spyridon
    Apostolopoulou, Sotiria C.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 132 (04) : 390 - 394
  • [8] Local diagnostic reference levels and effective doses: single institution levels for interventional cardiology procedures for adult patients
    Kidon, Joanna
    Polaczek-Grelik, Kinga
    Wojciuch, Leszek
    POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 28 (02): : 77 - 83
  • [9] Radiation dose to the heart in paediatric interventional cardiology
    Keiller, D. A.
    Martin, C. J.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2015, 35 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [10] Diagnostic Reference Levels, Deterministic and Stochastic Risks in Pediatric Interventional Cardiology Procedures
    Rizk, Chadia
    Fares, Georges
    Vanhavere, Filip
    Saliba, Zakhia
    Farah, Jad
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2020, 118 (01): : 85 - 95