Hybrid interval model for uncertainty analysis of imprecise or conflicting information

被引:5
|
作者
Qiang, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chong [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Haoran [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Inst Solid Mech, Sch Aeronaut Sci & Engn, Natl Key Lab Strength & Struct Integr, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Tianmushan Lab, Hangzhou 311115, Peoples R China
关键词
Epistemic uncertainty; Evidence theory; Hybrid ellipsoid-interval model integrating evidence theory; Data-driven basic probability assignment determination; Region optimal-based ensemble metamodel; Aeroengine blade; POINTWISE ENSEMBLE; OPTIMIZATION; METAMODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apm.2024.02.014
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
For many engineering problems with epistemic uncertainty, evidence theory provides a flexible modeling framework to tackle with imprecise and conflicting information. However, the traditional model established under evidence theory framework can solely address uncorrelated or correlated evidence variables, which curtails its application in engineering practices. This paper aims to develop a unified model for evidence theory-based uncertainty analysis with consideration of parameter independence and dependence coexist scenarios. With the aid of subspace decomposition, a hybrid ellipsoid-interval model integrating evidence theory is firstly developed to quantify uncorrelated and correlated evidence variables within a unified framework. To make full use of sample information, a data-driven strategy is further proposed to determine the basic probability assignment of the above focal elements. Subsequently, the belief and plausibility measures are calculated using proposed hybrid ellipsoid-interval model integrating evidence theory. To improve the efficiency and accuracy of belief degree calculation, a region optimalbased ensemble metamodel is further introduced by applying component metamodels together. Eventually, a test example and an aeroengine blade engineering application are investigated to substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed model and method.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 856
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Mode choice analysis with imprecise location information
    Toshiyuki Yamamoto
    Ryosuke Komori
    Transportation, 2010, 37 : 491 - 503
  • [43] Hybrid spatial uncertainty analysis for the estimation of imprecise failure probabilities in Laser Sintered PA-12 parts
    Faes, Matthias
    Sabyasachi, Ghosh Dastidar
    Moens, David
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 78 (07) : 2395 - 2406
  • [44] Editorial: Engineering analysis with vague and imprecise information
    Beer, Michael
    Patelli, Edoardo
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2015, 52 : 143 - 143
  • [45] DEVELOPING A SUCCESSFUL AEROTROPOLIS BY USING A HYBRID MODEL UNDER INFORMATION UNCERTAINTY
    Liou, James J. H.
    Hsu, Chao-Che
    Li, Chun-Sheng Joseph
    Pineda, Pedro Jose Gudiel
    Chang, Gin-Weng
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (03) : 1080 - 1103
  • [46] Interval efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with imprecise data
    Kao, Chiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (02) : 1087 - 1099
  • [47] A new hybrid uncertainty analysis method and its application to squeal analysis with random and interval variables
    Lu, Hui
    Shangguan, Wen-Bin
    Yu, Dejie
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2018, 51 : 1 - 10
  • [48] Uncertainty Measurement for Incomplete Interval-valued Information Systems by θ-rough Set Model
    Dai, Jianhua
    Wei, Bingjie
    Shi, Hong
    Liu, Wei
    2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (ICIM 2017), 2017, : 212 - 217
  • [49] Hybrid model for structural reliability with imprecise probabilistic characteristics
    Ma, Lihong
    Iu, Zhiping
    Wang, Xiaojun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED AND THEORETICAL MECHANICS (MECHANICS '07): TOPICS IN ADVANCED THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS, 2007, : 39 - +
  • [50] Judgments under uncertainty: evaluations of univocal, ambiguous and conflicting probability information
    Visschers, Vivianne H. M.
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2017, 20 (02) : 237 - 255