An adaptive finite-difference method for seismic traveltime modeling based on 3D eikonal equation

被引:0
|
作者
BaoPing Qiao [1 ]
QingQing Li [2 ]
WeiGuang He [3 ]
Dan Zhao [1 ]
QuBo Wu [1 ]
机构
[1] CNNC Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology
[2] National Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum (East China)
[3] SINOPEC Geophysical Research
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P631.4 [地震勘探];
学科分类号
摘要
3D eikonal equation is a partial differential equation for the calculation of first-arrival traveltimes and has been widely applied in many scopes such as ray tracing, source localization, reflection migration, seismic monitoring and tomographic imaging. In recent years, many advanced methods have been developed to solve the 3D eikonal equation in heterogeneous media. However, there are still challenges for the stable and accurate calculation of first-arrival traveltimes in 3D strongly inhomogeneous media. In this paper,we propose an adaptive finite-difference(AFD) method to numerically solve the 3D eikonal equation. The novel method makes full use of the advantages of different local operators characterizing different seismic wave types to calculate factors and traveltimes, and then the most accurate factor and traveltime are adaptively selected for the convergent updating based on the Fermat principle. Combined with global fast sweeping describing seismic waves propagating along eight directions in 3D media, our novel method can achieve the robust calculation of first-arrival traveltimes with high precision at grid points either near source point or far away from source point even in a velocity model with large and sharp contrasts. Several numerical examples show the good performance of the AFD method, which will be beneficial to many scientific applications.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 205
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive boundaryless finite-difference method
    Lopez-Mago, Dorilian
    Gutierrez-Vega, Julio C.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2013, 30 (02) : 259 - 263
  • [32] 3D elastic waveform modeling with an optimized equivalent staggered-grid finite-difference method
    Zou, Qiang
    Huang, Jian-Ping
    Yong, Peng
    Li, Zhen-Chun
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2020, 17 (04) : 967 - 989
  • [33] FPGA-based acceleration of the 3D finite-difference time-domain method
    Durbano, JP
    Ortiz, FE
    Humphrey, JR
    Curt, PF
    Prather, DW
    12TH ANNUAL IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON FIELD-PROGRAMMABLE CUSTOM COMPUTING MACHINES, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 156 - 163
  • [34] The Shortley-Weller embedded finite-difference method for the 3D Poisson equation with mixed boundary conditions
    Jomaa, Z.
    Macaskill, C.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2010, 229 (10) : 3675 - 3690
  • [35] Applying an advanced temporal and spatial high-order finite-difference stencil to 3D seismic wave modeling
    Xu, Shigang
    Bao, Qianzong
    Ren, Zhiming
    Liu, Yang
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2021, 436
  • [36] 3D constraints and finite-difference modeling of massive sulfide deposits: The Kristineberg seismic lines revisited, northern Sweden
    Dehghannejad, Mahdieh
    Malehmir, Alireza
    Juhlin, Christopher
    Skytta, Pietari
    GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 77 (05) : WC69 - WC79
  • [37] Seismic wavefield modeling based on time-domain symplectic and Fourier finite-difference method
    Fang, Gang
    Ba, Jing
    Liu, Xin-xin
    Zhu, Kun
    Liu, Guo-Chang
    APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14 (02) : 258 - 269
  • [38] A generalized 3D subgrid technique for the finite-difference time domain method
    Ritter, J
    Arndt, F
    1997 IEEE MTT-S INTERNATIONAL MICROWAVE SYMPOSIUM DIGEST, VOLS I-III: HIGH FREQUENCIES IN HIGH PLACES, 1997, : 1563 - 1566
  • [39] Hardware acceleration of the 3D finite-difference time-domain method
    Durbano, JP
    Humphrey, JR
    Ortiz, FE
    Curt, PF
    Prather, DW
    Mirotznik, MS
    IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION SOCIETY SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-4 2004, DIGEST, 2004, : 77 - 80
  • [40] Seismic wavefield modeling based on time-domain symplectic and Fourier finite-difference method
    Gang Fang
    Jing Ba
    Xin-xin Liu
    Kun Zhu
    Guo-Chang Liu
    Applied Geophysics, 2017, 14 : 258 - 269