Effectiveness of predicting tunneling-induced ground settlements using machine learning methods with small datasets

被引:0
|
作者
Linan Liu [1 ]
Wendy Zhou [1 ]
Marte Gutierrez [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines
[2] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U455.4 [施工方法]; P642.26 [地面沉降];
学科分类号
摘要
Prediction of tunneling-induced ground settlements is an essential task, particularly for tunneling in urban settings. Ground settlements should be limited within a tolerable threshold to avoid damages to aboveground structures. Machine learning(ML) methods are becoming popular in many fields, including tunneling and underground excavations, as a powerful learning and predicting technique. However, the available datasets collected from a tunneling project are usually small from the perspective of applying ML methods. Can ML algorithms effectively predict tunneling-induced ground settlements when the available datasets are small? In this study, seven ML methods are utilized to predict tunneling-induced ground settlement using 14 contributing factors measured before or during tunnel excavation. These methods include multiple linear regression(MLR), decision tree(DT), random forest(RF), gradient boosting(GB),support vector regression(SVR), back-propagation neural network(BPNN), and permutation importancebased BPNN(PI-BPNN) models. All methods except BPNN and PI-BPNN are shallow-structure ML methods. The effectiveness of these seven ML approaches on small datasets is evaluated using model accuracy and stability. The model accuracy is measured by the coefficient of determination(R~2) of training and testing datasets, and the stability of a learning algorithm indicates robust predictive performance. Also,the quantile error(QE) criterion is introduced to assess model predictive performance considering underpredictions and overpredictions. Our study reveals that the RF algorithm outperforms all the other models with the highest model prediction accuracy(0.9) and stability(3.02 × 10-27). Deep-structure ML models do not perform well for small datasets with relatively low model accuracy(0.59) and stability(5.76).The PI-BPNN architecture is proposed and designed for small datasets, showing better performance than typical BPNN. Six important contributing factors of ground settlements are identified, including tunnel depth, the distance between tunnel face and surface monitoring points(DTM), weighted average soil compressibility modulus(ACM), grouting pressure, penetrating rate and thrust force.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1041
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysing and predicting surface settlements from metro construction using machine learning methods
    Sioutas, K. N.
    Vlachogiorgos, A.
    Benardos, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ITA-AITES WORLD TUNNEL CONGRESS 2023, WTC 2023: Expanding Underground-Knowledge and Passion to Make a Positive Impact on the World, 2023, : 2902 - 2909
  • [22] Machine Learning Methods with Noisy, Incomplete or Small Datasets
    Caiafa, Cesar F.
    Sun, Zhe
    Tanaka, Toshihisa
    Marti-Puig, Pere
    Sole-Casals, Jordi
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [23] Predicting earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling-induced ground settlement in compound strata using random forest
    Ling, Xianzhang
    Kong, Xiangxun
    Tang, Liang
    Zhao, Yize
    Tang, Wenchong
    Zhang, Yifan
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 35
  • [24] Modeling of tunneling-induced ground surface movements using stochastic medium theory
    Yang, JS
    Liu, BC
    Wang, MC
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 19 (02) : 113 - 123
  • [25] An adaptability study of Gaussian equation applied to predicting ground settlements induced by tunneling in China
    Han Xuan
    Li Ning
    Standing, Jamie R.
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2007, 28 (01) : 23 - +
  • [26] Bayesian Approach for Sequential Probabilistic Back Analysis of Uncertain Geomechanical Parameters and Reliability Updating of Tunneling-Induced Ground Settlements
    Li, Cong
    Jiang, Shui-Hua
    Li, Jinhui
    Huang, Jinsong
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [27] Decomposition Methods for Machine Learning with Small, Incomplete or Noisy Datasets
    Caiafa, Cesar Federico
    Sole-Casals, Jordi
    Marti-Puig, Pere
    Zhe, Sun
    Tanaka, Toshihisa
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (23): : 1 - 20
  • [28] Optimized back-analysis for tunneling-induced ground movement using equivalent ground loss model
    Chi, SY
    Chern, JC
    Lin, CC
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 16 (03) : 159 - 165
  • [29] Use of freely available datasets and machine learning methods in predicting deforestation
    Mayfield, Helen
    Smith, Carl
    Gallagher, Marcus
    Hockings, Marc
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2017, 87 : 17 - 28
  • [30] 3D prediction of tunneling-induced ground movements based on a hybrid ANN and empirical methods
    M. Hajihassani
    R. Kalatehjari
    A. Marto
    H. Mohamad
    M. Khosrotash
    Engineering with Computers, 2020, 36 : 251 - 269