NONCOMPLIANCE WITH FOLLOW-UP AND IMPROVEMENT AFTER TREATMENT AT A HEADACHE CENTER

被引:18
|
作者
SPIERINGS, ELH
MIREE, LF
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT NEUROL,BOSTON,MA 02115
[2] UNIV W VIRGINIA,COLL GRAD STUDIES,SCH BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT,HLTH CARE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM,INSTITUTE,WV
来源
HEADACHE | 1993年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
COMPLIANCE; FOLLOW-UP; HEADACHE CENTER; TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4610.1993.hed33040205.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Two telephone surveys were conducted at a major headache center into patient compliance with follow-up and perceived treatment efficacy. The first survey addressed compliance with the recommendation to follow-up after the initial evaluation. Of a group of 316 consecutive patients, 40.5% had not complied with the recommended follow-up visit. Reasons for the non-compliance were given by 60.3%; most frequently mentioned were dislike of the clinician seen and seeking care elsewhere. The second survey concerned 75 patients who had returned at least once to the center for follow-up. When asked about the efficacy of the treatment received, 76.0% reported improvement of their headaches, with 32.0% reporting more than 75% improvement. In addition, 87.5% of the patients reported a decrease in the use of analgesic and/or ergotamine medications. We conclude that treatment of chronic headache is not a priori a hopeless situation and that in the patient compliance with the recommendation to follow-up, in particular the patient-clinician relationship is a critical factor.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 209
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 5 YEAR PROSPECTIVE FOLLOW-UP ON THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC HEADACHE WITH BIOFEEDBACK AND OR RELAXATION
    BLANCHARD, EB
    APPELBAUM, KA
    GUARNIERI, P
    MORRILL, B
    DENTINGER, MP
    HEADACHE, 1987, 27 (10): : 580 - 583
  • [32] CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP - TREATMENT AND OUTCOME OF FUNCTIONAL HEADACHE PATIENTS TREATED WITH BIOFEEDBACK
    RUSS, KL
    HAMMER, RL
    ADDERTON, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 35 (01) : 148 - 153
  • [33] Follow-up schedules after treatment for malignant melanoma
    Francken, A. B.
    Accortt, N. A.
    Shaw, H. M.
    Colman, M. H.
    Wiener, M.
    Soong, S. -J.
    Hoekstra, H. J.
    Thompson, J. F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (11) : 1401 - 1407
  • [34] FOLLOW-UP AFTER STENT TREATMENT FOR COARCTATION OF AORTA
    DELEZO, JS
    MEDINA, A
    PAN, M
    ROMERO, M
    GALLARDO, A
    MELIAN, F
    ESPADA, J
    SEGURA, J
    PAVLOVIC, D
    CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (08) : 1817 - 1817
  • [35] FOLLOW-UP OF DEPRESSED WOMEN AFTER MAINTENANCE TREATMENT
    WEISSMAN, MM
    KASL, SV
    KLERMAN, GL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1976, 133 (07): : 757 - 760
  • [36] Follow-up imaging of anal cancer after treatment
    Maria El Homsi
    Shannon P. Sheedy
    Gaiane M. Rauch
    Dhakshina M. Ganeshan
    Randy D. Ernst
    Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2888 - 2897
  • [37] Follow-up after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Bleeker, Maaike C. G.
    Meijer, Chris J. L. M.
    Berkhof, Johannes
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [38] Paradoxes of follow-up - health professionals' views on follow-up after surgical treatment in gynecological cancer
    Dahl, Lotte
    Wittrup, Inge
    Petersen, Lone Kjeld
    Blaakaer, Jan
    Vaeggemose, Ulla
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (02) : 194 - 199
  • [39] Follow-up imaging of anal cancer after treatment
    El Homsi, Maria
    Sheedy, Shannon P.
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Ganeshan, Dhakshina M.
    Ernst, Randy D.
    Pernicka, Jennifer Golia S.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (09) : 2888 - 2897
  • [40] Optimizing follow-up after breast cancer treatment
    Grunfeld, Eva
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 21 (01) : 92 - 96