Direct Hospital Cost of Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices

被引:16
|
作者
Qureshi, Ali A. [1 ]
Broderick, Kristen [1 ]
Funk, Susan [2 ]
Reaven, Nancy [2 ]
Tenenbaum, Marissa M. [1 ]
Myckatyn, Terence M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 1020 N Mason Rd,Ste 110, St Louis, MO 63141 USA
[2] Strateg Hlth Resources, La Canada Fltrdg, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000000848
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current cost data on tissue expansion followed by exchange for permanent implant (TE/I) reconstruction lack a necessary assessment of the experience of a heterogenous breast cancer patient population and their multiple outcome pathways. We extend our previous analysis to that of direct hospital cost as bundling of payments is likely to follow the changing centralization of cancer care at the hospital level. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis (2003-2009) of TE/I reconstructions with or without an acellular dermal matrix (ADM), namely Alloderm RTM. Postreconstructive events were analyzed and organized into outcome pathways as previously described. Aggregated and normalized inpatient and outpatient hospital direct costs and physician reimbursement were generated for each outcome pathway with or without ADM. Results: Three hundred sixty-seven patients were analyzed. The average 2-year hospital direct cost per TE/I breast reconstruction patient was $11,862 in the +ADM and $12,319 in the - ADM groups (P > 0.05). Initial reconstructions were costlier in the +ADM ($6,868) than in the - ADM ($5,615) group, but the average cost of subsequent postreconstructive events within 2 years was significantly lower in +ADM ($5,176) than - ADM ($6,704) patients (P < 0.05). When a complication occurred, but reconstruction was still completed within 2 years, greater costs were incurred in the -ADM than in the +ADM group for most scenarios, leading to a net equalization of cost between study groups. Conclusion: Although direct hospital cost is an important factor for resource and fund allocation, it should not remain the sole factor when deciding to use ADM in TE/I reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prophylactic antibiotic use in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction
    Mazari, F. A. K.
    Wattoo, G. M.
    Kazzazi, N. H.
    Kolar, K. M.
    Olubowale, O. O.
    Rogers, C. E.
    Azmy, I. A.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2021, 103 (03) : 186 - 190
  • [42] First Experience Using Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound to Evaluate Vascularisation of Acellular Dermal Matrices after Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Parvizi, Daryousch
    Haas, Franz
    Peintinger, Florentia
    Hubmer, Martin
    Rappl, Thomas
    Koch, Horst
    Schintler, Michael
    Spendel, Stephan
    Kamolz, Lars-Peter
    Wurzer, Paul
    Tuca, Alexandru
    Fuchsjaeger, Michael
    Weinke, Roland
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (05): : 461 - 467
  • [43] Commentary: Comparison of Outcomes in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Acellular Dermal Matrix versus Inferior Dermal Flap
    Ribeiro, Luis Mata
    Meireles, Rita P.
    Brito, Iris M.
    Costa, Patricia M.
    Rebelo, Marco A.
    Barbosa, Rui F.
    Choupina, Miguel P.
    Pinho, Carlos J.
    Ribeiro, Matilde P.
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2022, 49 (02): : 158 - 165
  • [44] A Comparison of Acellular Dermal Matrix to Autologous Dermal Flaps in Single-Stage, Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Krishnan, Naveen M.
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Van Vliet, Michael M.
    Powell, Stephen G.
    Rosen, Joseph M.
    Nigriny, John F.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (05) : 953 - 961
  • [45] Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction; complete acellular dermal matrix wrap or anterior circumferential cover
    Nadeem, Rana
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (02): : 223 - 224
  • [46] Economic Analysis and Review of the Literature on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With and Without the Use of the Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Jonathan Bank
    Nicole A. Phillips
    Julie E. Park
    David H. Song
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2013, 37 : 1194 - 1201
  • [47] Extended Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Pectoralis-Serratus Sling and Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Kolker, Adam R.
    Piccolo, Paulo P.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2017, 37 (04) : 485 - 491
  • [48] Economic Analysis and Review of the Literature on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With and Without the Use of the Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Bank, Jonathan
    Phillips, Nicole A.
    Park, Julie E.
    Song, David H.
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) : 1194 - 1201
  • [49] The Comparison of Strattice and SurgiMend in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted, Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Sheena, Yezen
    Ball, Jessica
    Benyon, Sarah Louise
    Forouhi, Parto
    Malata, Charles M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (05) : 789E - 790E
  • [50] Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial
    Gschwantler-Kaulich, D.
    Schrenk, P.
    Bjelic-Radisic, V.
    Unterrieder, K.
    Leser, C.
    Fink-Retter, A.
    Salama, M.
    Singer, C.
    EJSO, 2016, 42 (05): : 665 - 671