Direct Hospital Cost of Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices

被引:16
|
作者
Qureshi, Ali A. [1 ]
Broderick, Kristen [1 ]
Funk, Susan [2 ]
Reaven, Nancy [2 ]
Tenenbaum, Marissa M. [1 ]
Myckatyn, Terence M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 1020 N Mason Rd,Ste 110, St Louis, MO 63141 USA
[2] Strateg Hlth Resources, La Canada Fltrdg, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000000848
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current cost data on tissue expansion followed by exchange for permanent implant (TE/I) reconstruction lack a necessary assessment of the experience of a heterogenous breast cancer patient population and their multiple outcome pathways. We extend our previous analysis to that of direct hospital cost as bundling of payments is likely to follow the changing centralization of cancer care at the hospital level. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis (2003-2009) of TE/I reconstructions with or without an acellular dermal matrix (ADM), namely Alloderm RTM. Postreconstructive events were analyzed and organized into outcome pathways as previously described. Aggregated and normalized inpatient and outpatient hospital direct costs and physician reimbursement were generated for each outcome pathway with or without ADM. Results: Three hundred sixty-seven patients were analyzed. The average 2-year hospital direct cost per TE/I breast reconstruction patient was $11,862 in the +ADM and $12,319 in the - ADM groups (P > 0.05). Initial reconstructions were costlier in the +ADM ($6,868) than in the - ADM ($5,615) group, but the average cost of subsequent postreconstructive events within 2 years was significantly lower in +ADM ($5,176) than - ADM ($6,704) patients (P < 0.05). When a complication occurred, but reconstruction was still completed within 2 years, greater costs were incurred in the -ADM than in the +ADM group for most scenarios, leading to a net equalization of cost between study groups. Conclusion: Although direct hospital cost is an important factor for resource and fund allocation, it should not remain the sole factor when deciding to use ADM in TE/I reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uneventful versus Successful Reconstruction and Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices
    Qureshi, Ali A.
    Broderick, Kristen P.
    Belz, Jessica
    Funk, Susan
    Reaven, Nancy
    Brandt, Keith E.
    Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
    Margenthaler, Julie A.
    Aft, Rebecca L.
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (02) : 173E - 183E
  • [2] Cost Analysis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix
    de Blacam, Catherine
    Momoh, Adeyiza O.
    Colakoglu, Salih
    Slavin, Sumner A.
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (05) : 516 - 520
  • [3] A controlled cost and outcomes analysis of acellular dermal matrix and implant-based reconstruction
    Aliotta, Rachel E.
    Duraes, Eliana F. R.
    Scomacao, Isis
    Morisada, Megan
    Orra, Susan
    Moreira, Andrea
    Bernard, Steven
    Schwarz, Graham
    Djohan, Risal
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (06): : 1229 - 1238
  • [4] Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Bonomi, Stefano
    Settembrini, Fernanda
    Salval, Andre
    Gilardi, Roberta
    Musumarra, Gaetano
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (01) : 190E - 191E
  • [5] A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction
    Ball, Jessica F.
    Sheena, Yezen
    Saleh, Dina M. Tarek
    Forouhi, Parto
    Benyon, Sarah L.
    Irwin, Michael S.
    Malata, Charles M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (08): : 1076 - 1082
  • [6] Direct to implant breast reconstruction with biological acellular dermal matrices
    Teoh, Victoria
    Gui, Gerald
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2020, 81 (03)
  • [7] Reply: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Sbitany, Hani
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (01) : 191E - 192E
  • [8] Natural Shaping of Acellular Dermal Matrices for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction via Expansile Kirigami
    Lee, Young-Joo
    Kanchwala, Suhail K.
    Cho, Hyesung
    Jolly, Jason Christopher
    Jablonka, Eric
    Tanis, Michael
    Kamien, Randall D.
    Yang, Shu
    ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2023, 35 (06)
  • [9] Complication Rate of Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrices
    Mangialardi, Maria Lucia
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Cacciatore, Pasquale
    Baldelli, Ilaria
    Raposio, Edoardo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (12) : E3235
  • [10] Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Gravina, Paula R.
    Pettit, Rowland W.
    Davis, Matthew J.
    Winocour, Sebastian J.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 33 (04) : 229 - 235