MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR DETERMINING APPROPRIATE HOST COUNTRIES FOR SYRIAN REFUGEES

被引:0
|
作者
Oruc, Kenan Oguzhan [1 ]
Kilinc, Merve [2 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Ekonometri Bolumu, Isparta, Turkey
[2] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Isletme Bolumu, Afyon, Turkey
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision Making; TOPSIS; Grey Relational Analysis; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Entropy; Syrian Civil War; Refugees;
D O I
10.30798/makuiibf.410155
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
After the civil war in Syria in 2011, Syrian people had to immigrate in groups massively to the other countries. One of the general principles, which guarantees the life of immigrants and asylum seekers and provides not be sent back to home countries, is non-refoulement principle. Although this principle has been mentioned on international agreements and protocols, its affects are not seen real life. In this study, the problem of determining the most suitable country for Syrian people is approached within the scope of fundamental human rights. The sets of alternative countries, which is limited with 46 countries, are evaluated according to 7 criteria. In determining criteria, Analytic Hierarchy Process and Entropy Method are used. While TOPSIS method makes analysis according to distance of alternative values the analysis point, GRA makes analysis using grey obscurity factor. As a result of the study, 4 different alternative sets of countries have been determined depending on the weight and methods. Additionally, the similarities and differences between these groups are interpreted with their reasons and results.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 244
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR DETERMINING COMPUTER PREFERENCE INDEX
    Kasim, Maznah Mat
    Ibrahim, Haslinda
    Bataineh, Mahmoud S.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY-MALAYSIA, 2011, 10 : 137 - 148
  • [2] METHODS FOR DETERMINING OF CRITERIA WEIGHTS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ASSIGNMENTS
    Moldrik, Petr
    Vansky, Tomas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING 2005, 2005, : 356 - 362
  • [3] Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study
    Ben-Arieh, D
    INTERFACES, 2002, 32 (02) : 81 - 83
  • [4] Determining the appropriate location for renewable hydrogen development using multi-criteria decision-making approaches
    Almutairi, Khalid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (05) : 5876 - 5895
  • [5] Determining criteria weights with genetic algorithms for multi-criteria decision making methods: The case of logistics performance index rankings of European Union countries
    Gurler, Hasan Emin
    Ozcalici, Mehmet
    Pamucar, Dragan
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2024, 91
  • [6] Multi-Criteria Decision Making For Determining A Simple Model of Supplier Selection
    Harwati
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING, OPTIMIZATION, INDUSTRIAL AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 215
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision making methods for designing optomechatronic systems
    Institute for Sustainable Technologies, National Research Institute, ul. Pulaskiego 6/10, Radom
    PL-26-600, Poland
    Solid State Phenomena, (188-193): : 188 - 193
  • [8] Cognitive support methods for multi-criteria expert decision making
    Bisdorff, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 119 (02) : 379 - 387
  • [9] A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Castillo-Lopez, Elena
    Rodriguez-Hernandez, Jorge
    Canteras-Jordana, Juan Carlos
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 45 : 151 - 162
  • [10] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322