COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, VIBRATORS AND HEARING-AIDS IN THE REHABILITATION OF POSTLINGUAL DEAFNESS

被引:1
|
作者
RIHKANEN, H
JAUHIAINEN, T
LINKOLA, H
PALVA, T
机构
[1] Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, Helsinki
来源
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY | 1990年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
cochlear implant; hearing aid; vibrotactile aid;
D O I
10.3109/01050399009070762
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Cochlear implants, vibrators and hearing aids in the rehabilitation of postlingual deafness. Rihkanen, H., Jauhiainen, T. Linkola, H. and Palva. T. (Department of Otolaryngology, Universi:y Hospital, Helsinki, Finland). Scand Avdiol 1990; 19: 117-121. Three groups of postlingually deaf adults were formed by non-random selection. The subjects with some residual hearing were fitted with a powerful hearing aid (HA group, n= 10). The others received either a single-channel vibrotactile aid (V group, n = 8) or a single-channel intracochlear implant (CI group, n = 10). Training containing individual counselling and rehearsal in small groups was arranged. During the follow-up (CI group 2.0 yrs, V group 1.8 yrs, HA group 2.6 yrs). the subject's achievement was assessed by a repetition of audiological testing and written questionnaires. Whereas the HA group obtained the highest scores in the audiological tests, the CI group found the implant most beneficial in everyday life. No significant improvement in the test scores was observed during the follow-up. The extent of personal training, after an initial training period and motivation of the user, did not affect the test scores or the subjective evaluation. © 1990, Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 121
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prelingual deafness: Benefits from cochlear implants versus conventional hearing aids
    Bittencourt, Aline Gomes
    Giantomassi Della Torre, Ana Adelina
    Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
    Tsuji, Robinson Koji
    de Brito, Rubens
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 16 (03) : 387 - 390
  • [22] COMPARISON OF EARLY COMMUNICATIVE-BEHAVIOR IN YOUNG-CHILDREN WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND WITH HEARING-AIDS
    TAIT, M
    LUTMAN, ME
    EAR AND HEARING, 1994, 15 (05): : 352 - 361
  • [23] Phonological processing skills and speech understanding with hearing-aids and cochlear implants in individuals with severe hearing loss.
    Lyxell, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 6 - 6
  • [24] COMPARISON OF SPEECH-PERCEPTION ABILITIES IN DEAF-CHILDREN WITH HEARING-AIDS OR COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    MIYAMOTO, RT
    OSBERGER, MJ
    ROBBINS, AM
    MYRES, WA
    KESSLER, K
    POPE, ML
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1991, 104 (01) : 42 - 46
  • [25] HEARING-AIDS AND AURAL REHABILITATION IN A GERIATRIC POPULATION
    ALBERTI, PW
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1977, 6 : 1 - 50
  • [27] Hearing in the Elderly: Cochlear Implants in Comparison to Hearing Aids
    Steffens, Thomas
    Kiessling, Juergen
    Mueller-Deile, Joachim
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2012, 17 : 6 - 7
  • [28] Hearing problems treated with hearing aids and cochlear implants
    Filipovic, M
    Crnogorac, D
    Fajt, S
    PROCEEDINGS ELMAR-2004: 46TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ELECTRONICS IN MARINE, 2004, : 265 - 270
  • [29] Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids
    Bittencourt, Aline Gomes
    Ikari, Liliane Satomi
    Giantomassi Della Torre, Ana Adelina
    Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
    Tsuji, Robinson Koji
    de Brito Neto, Rubens Vuono
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 78 (02) : 124 - 127
  • [30] HEARING WITH HEARING-AIDS
    SCHULTZCOULON, HJ
    SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 1978, 2 (02): : 61 - 69