Do local land institutions make a dime's worth of a difference in rural land markets? Evidence from Malawi

被引:1
|
作者
Matchaya, Greenwell [1 ]
机构
[1] IWMI SA, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Property rights; Land markets; Land ownership security; Malawi;
D O I
10.1108/IJSE-08-2012-0163
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - It has been argued that traditional land transfer systems provide disincentives for farmers to trade their land, thus reducing land availability and depressing productivity. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the determinants of land rentals under customary land ownership in matrilineal and patrilineal traditions and under formal land registration in the rural areas of Malawi. Design/methodology/approach - Using new data collected from around 100 households farming around 200 parcels in three regions of Malawi, a number of models are estimated with ordinary least squares. Findings - The paper finds some evidence that some variables within the traditional system of land holding are crucial for land rentals. However, when land titles are used as a proxy for security of tenure, none of the relationships commonly hypothesized between land ownership security and land lease are corroborated. Land registration is found to have no significant effects on land and rentals. Social implications - These results put into question the potency of sole land registration as a means of enhancing land market activities for rural masses in Malawi. Originality/value - The uniqueness of this paper rests in it its use of context-specific constructs of land ownership security. Moreover the tested hypotheses emerge from a theoretical model that is unique to the literature on rural land markets and land tenure.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1072
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mitigating Farmland Fragmentation through Land Rental Markets: Evidence from Rural Households in Northeast and Central Thailand
    Duangbootsee, Uchook
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 31 (02): : 31 - 49
  • [22] How do national markets and price policies affect land use at the forest margin? Evidence from the Philippines
    Coxhead, I
    Rola, A
    Kim, K
    LAND ECONOMICS, 2001, 77 (02) : 250 - 267
  • [23] The role of land tenure security in promoting rural women's empowerment: Empirical evidence from rural China
    Han, Wenjing
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Zhengfeng
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 86 : 280 - 289
  • [24] Do they make a difference? Professional team sports clubs' effects on migration and local growth: Evidence from Denmark
    Storm, Rasmus K.
    Thomsen, Frederik
    Jakobsen, Tor Georg
    SPORT MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 20 (03) : 285 - 295
  • [25] Rural land and credit markets, the permanent income hypothesis and proto-industry: evidence from early modern Zurich
    Pfister, Ulrich
    CONTINUITY AND CHANGE, 2007, 22 : 489 - 518
  • [26] Internet use and land transfer in: empirical evidence from China’s rural panel data
    Fengwan Zhang
    Xueling Bao
    Shili Guo
    Xin Deng
    Jiahao Song
    Dingde Xu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 88288 - 88301
  • [27] Internet use and land transfer in: empirical evidence from China's rural panel data
    Zhang, Fengwan
    Bao, Xueling
    Guo, Shili
    Deng, Xin
    Song, Jiahao
    Xu, Dingde
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (58) : 88288 - 88301
  • [28] Do Minority-Serving Institutions Make a Difference in the Engagement and Outcomes of Minority College Students? Empirical Evidence from China
    Huang, Yuheng
    Han, Zengchen
    Tian, Yu
    Cao, Yannan
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2025, 15 (01)
  • [29] Do land renting-in and its marketization increase labor input in agriculture? Evidence from rural China
    Qiu Tongwei
    Luo, Biliang
    Choy, S. T. Boris
    Li, Yifei
    He, Qinying
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 99
  • [30] How do socioeconomic differentiation and rural governance affect households' land transfer decisions? Evidence from China
    Liu, Chongchong
    Wang, Ying
    Yang, Bin
    Zheng, Liang
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 35 (02) : 884 - 897