Inelastic sports ticket pricing, marginal win revenue, and firm pricing strategy A behavioral pricing model

被引:7
|
作者
Chang, Yang-Ming [1 ]
Potter, Joel M. [2 ]
Sanders, Shane [3 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Univ North Georgia, Finance & Econ, Dahlonega, GA USA
[3] Western Illinois Univ, Econ & Decis Sci, Macomb, IL 61455 USA
关键词
Home advantage; Crowd factors; Firm pricing strategy; Inelastic sports ticket pricing;
D O I
10.1108/MF-02-2016-0047
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - A standard result of firm theory is that a monopoly maximizes profit somewhere along the elastic portion of its demand curve. However, empirical studies of sports ticket pricing routinely find that (home) teams price along the inelastic portion of demand. Despite compelling theoretical explanations of this finding, at least one important factor remains unconsidered. A profit-maximizing team considers not only direct marginal revenue and direct marginal cost when setting a ticket price but also deferred, strategic benefit (revenue) from present game success. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - Prior literature finds that a given win is valued in that it generates additional future revenue and likelihood of home victory rises, ceteris paribus, in crowd density. The authors construct a firm profit maximization problem in which a sports team considers both present and future revenue when pricing home games in the present period. Findings - If the deferred benefit is sufficiently large, a forward-looking, profit-maximizing team prices along the inelastic portion of its static demand curve. Importantly, this same price falls along the elastic portion of the firm's (empirically unobserved) dynamic demand curve. Originality/value - This is the first model of sports ticket pricing to recognize the intertemporal nature of demand for a sports match.
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 927
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pricing and Revenue Optimization Strategy in Macro-Femto Heterogeneous Networks
    Werda, Wafa
    Gu, Bo
    Yamori, Kyoko
    Tanaka, Yoshiaki
    2016 18TH ASIA-PACIFIC NETWORK OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM (APNOMS), 2016,
  • [42] Revenue maximization and pricing: an ethanol supply chain and logistical strategy perspectives
    Awudu, Iddrisu
    Wilson, William
    Baah, George
    Gonela, Vinay
    Yakubu, Mariama
    JOURNAL OF REVENUE AND PRICING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 23 (01) : 62 - 75
  • [43] Traffic Behaviors Simulation under Congestion Pricing Revenue Redistribution Strategy
    Zhao, Zebin
    Tian, Yu
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE, PTS 1-3, 2013, 253-255 : 1982 - 1987
  • [44] Revenue maximization and pricing: an ethanol supply chain and logistical strategy perspectives
    Iddrisu Awudu
    William Wilson
    George Baah
    Vinay Gonela
    Mariama Yakubu
    Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2024, 23 : 62 - 75
  • [45] Variable Pricing in Restaurant Revenue Management: A Priority Mixed Bundle Strategy
    Webb, Timothy
    Ma, Jing
    Cheng, Andong
    CORNELL HOSPITALITY QUARTERLY, 2023, 64 (01) : 22 - 33
  • [46] Is volumetric pricing for drinking water an effective revenue strategy in rural Mali?
    Wagner, Johannes
    Koehler, Johanna
    Dupuis, Mikael
    Hope, Rob
    NPJ CLEAN WATER, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [47] A Tradeoff Pricing Strategy Using AHP for Revenue Maximization in WiMAX Networks
    Chowdhury, Prasun
    Kundu, Anindita
    Misra, Iti Saha
    Sanyal, Salil K.
    2011 ANNUAL IEEE INDIA CONFERENCE (INDICON-2011): ENGINEERING SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS, 2011,
  • [48] An Engineering Pricing Model for Scenic Spots Based on Revenue Management
    Duan Zhiping
    Li Ranran
    Ma Huaifu
    ENGINEERING AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2011, 1 : 279 - 285
  • [49] A game theoretic model for airline revenue management and competitive pricing
    Isler, Karl
    Imhof, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF REVENUE AND PRICING MANAGEMENT, 2008, 7 (04) : 384 - 396
  • [50] A game theoretic model for airline revenue management and competitive pricing
    Karl Isler
    Henrik Imhof
    Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2008, 7 (4) : 384 - 396