Intangible capital and productivity at the firm level: a panel data assessment

被引:46
|
作者
Bontempi, Maria Elena [1 ]
Mairesse, Jacques [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Econ, Bologna, Italy
[2] ENSAE, CREST, Paris, France
[3] Maastricht Univ, UNU MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
capitalised intangibles; expensed intangibles; production function; CES; panel data; robustness;
D O I
10.1080/10438599.2014.897859
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The econometric literature on measuring returns on intangible capital is vast, but we still know little about the effects on productivity of different types of intellectual capital (R&D and patents) and customer capital (trademarks and advertising). The aim of this paper is to estimate the marginal productivity of different types of intangibles by relying on the theoretical framework of the production function, which we apply to a large panel of Italian companies. To this end, the European accounting system makes it possible to compare the impact on productivity of intangibles measured from expenditures (as usual in Anglo-American studies) with the impact of intangible assets reported by companies in their balance sheets (a measure which is available in the Italian context, for example, but less common in the literature). Our results contribute two main findings to the literature. First, among the intangible components, the highest marginal productivity is that of intellectual capital, customer capital and intangible assets. Second, the use of accounting information on intangible investments is crucial to find high effects of intangible assets on productivity, while intangibles measured from expenses seem to play a more limited role. Preliminary results obtained from sub-samples mimicking the presence of spillovers deliver higher effects of intellectual capital on productivity, suggesting that intangibles' social value is larger than the part we can estimate with individual firm data.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 51
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Public capital and growth revisited: A panel data assessment
    Dessus, S
    Herrera, R
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2000, 48 (02) : 407 - 418
  • [32] Intangible assets and cost of capital: An application for a technology utilizing firm
    Tokmakcioglu, Kaya
    Tas, Oktay
    Gozlu, Sitki
    PICMET '07: PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGEMENT OF CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 45 - 51
  • [33] Firm size and enterprise productivity in Nigeria: Evidence from firm-level data
    Omeje, Ambrose Nnaemeka
    Mba, Augustine Jideofor
    Rena, Ravinder
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 16 (07): : 966 - 978
  • [34] The Impact of Intangible Capital on Firm Profitability in the Technology and Healthcare Sectors
    Dragomir, Voicu D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [35] The impact of educational mismatch on firm productivity: Evidence from linked panel data
    Kampelmann, Stephan
    Rycx, Francois
    ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2012, 31 (06) : 918 - 931
  • [36] UNION RENT SEEKING, INTANGIBLE CAPITAL, AND MARKET VALUE OF THE FIRM
    CONNOLLY, RA
    HIRSCH, BT
    HIRSCHEY, M
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1986, 68 (04) : 567 - 577
  • [37] Total factor productivity growth at the firm-level: The effects of capital account liberalization
    Li, Xiang
    Su, Dan
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 139
  • [38] Investment and the exchange rate: An analysis with firm-level panel data
    Nucci, F
    Pozzolo, AF
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 45 (02) : 259 - 283
  • [39] Investment and taxation in Germany - Evidence from firm level panel data
    Harhoff, D
    Ramb, F
    INVESTING TODAY FOR THE WORLD OF TOMORROW: STUDIES ON THE INVESTMENT PROCESS IN EUROPE, 2001, : 47 - 83
  • [40] Unions, collective agreements and productivity: A firm-level analysis using Norwegian matched employer-employee panel data
    Svarstad, Elin
    Kostol, Fredrik B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2022, 60 (04) : 864 - 894