Relationships among e-learning systems and e-learning outcomes: A path analysis model

被引:15
|
作者
Eom, Sean B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Missouri State Univ, Dept Accounting, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 USA
关键词
E-learning systems; system quality; information quality; user-satisfaction; and self-regulated learning behavior;
D O I
10.3233/HSM-2011-0752
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this study, path analysis modeling is applied to examine the relationships among e-learning systems, self-efficacy, and students' perceived learning outcomes in the context of university online courses. Independent variables included in the study are e-learning system quality, information quality, computer self-efficacy, system-use, self-regulated learning behavior, and user satisfaction as potential determinants of online learning outcomes. A total of 674 valid unduplicated responses from students who have completed at least one online course at a university in the Midwest were used to fit the path analysis model. The results indicated that system quality, information quality, and computer self-efficacy all affected system use, user satisfaction, and self-managed learning behavior. The findings from the current study have significant implications for the distance educators, students, and administrators. First, university administrators must continuously invest to upgrade the systems so that e-learning systems exhibit faster response time, better systems accessibility, higher system reliability and flexibility, and ease of learning. Second, the instructor in e-learning courses should facilitate, stimulate, guide, and challenge his/her students via empowering them with freedom and responsibility. Third, In order for the e-learning system to be successful, it should provide e-learners with the information and knowledge they need.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 241
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FIT FOR E-LEARNING? TRAININGS FOR E-LEARNING COMPETENCIES
    Bremer, Claudia
    EDULEARN10: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2010,
  • [22] From e-learning space to e-learning place
    Wahlstedt, Ari
    Pekkola, Samuli
    Niemela, Marketta
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (06) : 1020 - 1030
  • [23] Grit in the path to e-learning success
    Aparicio, Manuela
    Bacao, Fernando
    Oliveira, Tiago
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 66 : 388 - 399
  • [24] E-Learning Design Based on E-Learning Readiness
    Parlakkilic, Alaattin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2025, 60 (01)
  • [25] A Trust Evaluation Model for E-Learning Systems
    Tan, Wenan
    Chen, Senbo
    Li, Jingxian
    Li, Lingxia
    Wang, Tong
    Hu, Xiaoming
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2014, 31 (03) : 353 - 365
  • [26] An e-Learning Model for Enterprise Systems Education
    McCarthy, Brendan
    BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION THROUGH INNOVATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE, VOLS 1-2, 2010, : 788 - 792
  • [27] A secure model for building e-learning systems
    Masadeh, Shadi R
    Turab, Nedal
    Obisat, Farhan
    Network Security, 2012, 2012 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [28] An E-Learning Model in a Systems Theory Approach
    Raileanu, Brandusa
    NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND REDESIGNING LEARNING SPACES, VOL II, 2019, : 430 - 437
  • [29] Towards a theory of e-learning: Experiential e-learning
    Beard, Colin
    Wilson, John P.
    McCarter, Richard
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY LEISURE SPORT & TOURISM EDUCATION, 2007, 6 (02) : 3 - 15
  • [30] E-Learning Indicators: A Multidimensional Model for Evaluating and Planning E-Learning Solutions
    Fetaji, Bekim
    Fetaji, Majlinda
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL LEARNING: VIRTUAL LEARNING - VIRTUAL REALITY: MODELS & METHODOLOGIES, TECHNOLOGIES, SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, 2007, : 187 - 196