SOIL-CORE BREAK METHOD TO ESTIMATE PINE ROOT DISTRIBUTION

被引:25
|
作者
ESCAMILLA, JA
COMERFORD, NB
NEARY, DG
机构
[1] US FOREST SERV,DEP SOIL SCI,GAINESVILLE,FL 32611
[2] US FOREST SERV,SE FOR EXP STN,GAINESVILLE,FL 32611
[3] UNIV FLORIDA,DEPT SOIL SCI,GAINESVILLE,FL 32611
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500060036x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Root-distribution studies are tedious and time consuming; therefore, root systems of forest ecosystems are one of the least studied components. Yet they are essential in order to assess belowground effects of forest-management activities. This study used the soil core-break method to measure the number of roots crossing a horizontal unit area (N, expressed in no. cm-2) as an alternative to measuring the more time consuming root-length density (Lv, expressed as cm root length cm-3 soil volume). Soil core samples were taken from the surface horizon of a 7-yr-old slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) stand growing on a Pomona sand (sandy, silliceous, hyperthermic Ultic Hapiaquod). Soil cores, 15.2-cm diameter by 30 cm long, were extracted from two microsite locations within the check and complete-weed-control plots. Root-length density and roots per square centimeter were measured at 2-cm depth increments. The roots-per-square centimeter measure was a useful predictor of root-length density only when treatment means were used, and even then the data did not fit the theoretical relationship of Lv = 2N. An Lv/N slope of = 1 suggested that roots have a preferential vertical orientation in the A horizon. However, depth trends of root-length density and roots per square centimeter were similar regardless of management practices or microsite. Roots measured as roots per square centimeter was also a less variable measure of root quantity than was root-length density. Although roots per square centimeter can only be used to calculate root-length density on an empirical basis, the more easily obtained value of roots per square centimeter can be used to depict root response to belowground competition.
引用
收藏
页码:1722 / 1726
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SOIL CARBON, NITROGEN, AND FINE ROOT BIOMASS SAMPLING IN A PINE STAND
    RUARK, GA
    ZARNOCH, SJ
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1992, 56 (06) : 1945 - 1950
  • [42] A METHOD TO ESTIMATE SOIL LOSS FROM EROSION
    OLSON, KR
    BEAVERS, AH
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1987, 51 (02) : 441 - 445
  • [43] Differential effects of pine wilt disease on root endosphere, rhizosphere, and soil microbiome of Korean white pine
    Hou, Zehai
    Wang, Mingwei
    Xu, Hongwei
    Wang, Minggang
    Hannula, S. Emilia
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2025,
  • [44] The use of the ingrowth core method for measuring root production of arable crops - influence of soil and root disturbance during installation of the bags on root ingrowth into the cores
    Steingrobe, B
    Schmid, H
    Claassen, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2001, 15 (02) : 143 - 151
  • [45] DISTRIBUTION OF BARLEY ROOT BIOMASS IN SOIL PROFILE
    Klimesova, J.
    Streda, T.
    MENDELNET 2013, 2013, : 69 - 74
  • [46] Effect of root distribution on change in soil moisture
    Inosako, K
    Nakano, Y
    Kuroda, M
    Takuma, K
    ADVANCES IN HYDRAULICS AND WATER ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 505 - 510
  • [47] Distribution of nitrates in the soil and root development in coffee
    Beckley, VA
    McNaughton, F
    NATURE, 1933, 131 : 878 - 878
  • [48] SOIL LAYER DISTRIBUTION OF RICE ROOT SYSTEM
    HOLLIS, JP
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1968, 58 (08) : 1053 - &
  • [49] Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
    Whalley, W. R.
    Binley, A.
    Watts, C. W.
    Shanahan, P.
    Dodd, I. C.
    Ober, E. S.
    Ashton, R. W.
    Webster, C. P.
    White, R. P.
    Hawkesford, M. J.
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2017, 415 (1-2) : 407 - 422
  • [50] Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
    W.R. Whalley
    A. Binley
    C.W. Watts
    P. Shanahan
    I.C. Dodd
    E.S. Ober
    R.W. Ashton
    C.P. Webster
    R.P. White
    M. J. Hawkesford
    Plant and Soil, 2017, 415 : 407 - 422