A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial

被引:24
|
作者
Singh, Anisha [1 ]
Bhalotra, Anju R. [1 ]
Anand, Raktima [1 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Med Coll, Dept Anesthesia, New Delhi, India
关键词
Anaesthesia; laryngeal mask; time; ventilation;
D O I
10.4103/ija.IJA_153_18
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices are widely used in current anaesthesia practice. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate and compare laryngeal mask airway: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and I-gel. Methods: Eighty-four adult patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly allocated to three groups: group P (PLMA), group I (I-gel) and group S (SLMA) of 28 patients each. Insertion times, number of insertion attempts, haemodynamic response to insertion, ease of insertion of airway device and gastric tube, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were assessed. The primary outcome measure was the OLP after successful device insertion. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18.0 software using Chi-squared/Fisher's exact test (categorical data) and analysis of variance (continuous data) tests. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The demographic profile of patients was comparable. OLP measured after insertion, 30 minutes later and at the end of surgery differed significantly between the three groups (P < 0.001). The mean OLP was 32.64 +/- 4.14 cm center dot H2O in group P and 29.79 +/- 3.70 cm center dot H2O in group S. In group I, the mean OLP after insertion was 26.71 +/- 3.45 cm H2O, which increased to 27.36 +/- 3.22 cm H2O at 30 minutes and to 27.50 +/- 3.24 cm H2O towards the end of surgery. However, these increases were not statistically significant (P = 0.641). Device insertion time was longest for group P (P = 0.001) and gastric tube insertion time was longest for group I (P = 0.001). Haemodynamic response to insertion and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were similar with all three devices. Conclusion: PLMA provides better sealing pressure but takes longer to insert. I-gel and SLMA have similar sealing pressures. I-gel insertion time is quicker.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 864
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of incidence of sore throat with laryngeal mask airway Protector and laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: A randomised clinical trial
    Mohan, Vidya
    Rudingwa, Priya
    Panneerselvam, Sakthirajan
    Kuberan, Aswini
    Srinivasan, Gnanasekaran
    Arulprakasam, Santhosh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (07) : 637 - 643
  • [22] A prospective study to evaluate and compare laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and i-gel airway in the prone position
    Taxak, Susheela
    Gopinath, Ajith
    Saini, Savita
    Bansal, Teena
    Ahlawat, Mangal Singh
    Bala, Manju
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 9 (04) : 446 - 450
  • [23] Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial
    Belena, Jose M.
    Nunez, Monica
    Anta, Diego
    Carnero, Maria
    Gracia, Jose L.
    Ayala, Jose L.
    Alvarez, Raquel
    Yuste, Javier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 30 (03) : 119 - 123
  • [24] Airway morbidity after use of the laryngeal mask airway: LMA ProSeal® vs. i-gel®
    Soliveres, J.
    Balaguer, J.
    Richart, M. T.
    Sanchez, J.
    Solaz, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 257 - 258
  • [25] Comparative evaluation of Air-Q blocker and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial
    Jindal, Swati
    Mittal, Ankita
    Anand, Lakesh K.
    Singh, Manpreet
    Kapoor, Dheeraj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 65 (13) : S20 - S26
  • [26] The Proseal laryngeal mask airway and elective caesarean section
    Dyer, R. A.
    James, M. F.
    Butwick, A. J.
    Carvalho, B.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2011, 39 (04) : 760 - 761
  • [27] Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway proseal for laryngopharyngeal trauma and postoperative morbidity in children
    Aydogmus, Meltem Turkay
    Eksioglu, Birsen
    Oba, Sibel
    Unsal, Oya
    Turk, Hacer Sebnem Yeltepe
    Sinikoglu, Saki Nadir
    Tug, Aslihan
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2013, 63 (06): : 445 - 449
  • [28] Evaluating the Clinical Performance and Upper Airway Morbidity of I-Gel and its Comparison with Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway-A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Asha, H. L.
    Nagaraj, M. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (04) : UC1 - UC5
  • [29] Resistive load of laryngeal mask airway and proseal laryngeal mask airway in mechanically ventilated patients
    Natalini, G
    Rosano, A
    Lanza, G
    Martinelli, E
    Pletti, C
    Bernardini, A
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (06) : 761 - 764
  • [30] A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings
    Fukuhara, Aya
    Okutani, Ryu
    Oda, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (01) : 1 - 6