A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial

被引:24
|
作者
Singh, Anisha [1 ]
Bhalotra, Anju R. [1 ]
Anand, Raktima [1 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Med Coll, Dept Anesthesia, New Delhi, India
关键词
Anaesthesia; laryngeal mask; time; ventilation;
D O I
10.4103/ija.IJA_153_18
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices are widely used in current anaesthesia practice. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate and compare laryngeal mask airway: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and I-gel. Methods: Eighty-four adult patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly allocated to three groups: group P (PLMA), group I (I-gel) and group S (SLMA) of 28 patients each. Insertion times, number of insertion attempts, haemodynamic response to insertion, ease of insertion of airway device and gastric tube, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were assessed. The primary outcome measure was the OLP after successful device insertion. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18.0 software using Chi-squared/Fisher's exact test (categorical data) and analysis of variance (continuous data) tests. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The demographic profile of patients was comparable. OLP measured after insertion, 30 minutes later and at the end of surgery differed significantly between the three groups (P < 0.001). The mean OLP was 32.64 +/- 4.14 cm center dot H2O in group P and 29.79 +/- 3.70 cm center dot H2O in group S. In group I, the mean OLP after insertion was 26.71 +/- 3.45 cm H2O, which increased to 27.36 +/- 3.22 cm H2O at 30 minutes and to 27.50 +/- 3.24 cm H2O towards the end of surgery. However, these increases were not statistically significant (P = 0.641). Device insertion time was longest for group P (P = 0.001) and gastric tube insertion time was longest for group I (P = 0.001). Haemodynamic response to insertion and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were similar with all three devices. Conclusion: PLMA provides better sealing pressure but takes longer to insert. I-gel and SLMA have similar sealing pressures. I-gel insertion time is quicker.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 864
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the I-Gel Supraglottic Airway During the Bailey Manoeuvre in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
    Kalra, Nishant
    Gupta, Akhilesh
    Sood, Rajesh
    Kaur, Mohandeep
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2021, 49 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [2] The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients
    Shin, Won-Jung
    Cheong, Yu-Seon
    Yang, Hong-Seuk
    Nishiyama, Tomoki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (07) : 598 - 601
  • [3] A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal (TM) laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients
    Nirupa, R.
    Gombar, Satinder
    Ahuja, Vanita
    Sharma, Preeti
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 60 (10) : 726 - 731
  • [4] Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway With the LMA-Supreme for Airway Management in Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Vertebral Surgery
    Kang, Fang
    Li, Juan
    Chai, XiaoQing
    Yu, JinGui
    Zhang, HuaMing
    Tang, ChaoLiang
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 27 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [5] A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER COMPARISON OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY PROSEAL AND LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY SUPREME IN ANESTHETIZED ADULT PATIENTS
    Jannu, Vinayaka
    Dhorigol, M. G.
    Sanikop, C. S.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (85): : 14828 - 14833
  • [6] Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients A randomised controlled trial
    Kim, Myoung H.
    Lee, Jae H.
    Choi, Yong S.
    Park, Sujung
    Shin, Seokyung
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 35 (08) : 598 - 604
  • [7] Comparison between i-gel airway an the proseal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia
    Acharya, R.
    Dave, N. M.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (02): : 97 - 102
  • [8] COMPARISON OF SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE I-GEL WITH CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AND PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR SHORT SURGICAL PROCEDURES
    Gandhi, Monika
    Arora, K. K.
    Sharma, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (18): : 2222 - 2226
  • [9] A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF THE I-GEL WITH THE PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS
    Fukuhara, A.
    Okutani, R.
    Oda, Y.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 114
  • [10] Comparing performance of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and I-gel in anesthetized adult patients Reply
    Ekinci, Osman
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (09) : 1130 - 1131