University-Industry Collaboration in the Automotive, Biotechnology, and Electronics Firms in Malaysia

被引:0
|
作者
Rasiah, Rajah [1 ]
Govindaraju, Chandran V. G. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Dept Adm Studies & Polit, Technol & Innovat Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol MARA, Dept Econ, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
关键词
University-industry collaboration; R&D; Automotives; Biotechnology; Electronics; Malaysia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper seeks to examine existing explanations of drivers of university-industry collaboration. The Probit regression results support prevailing theory on the importance of R&D intensity, partner diversity and access to wider channels of information matter for university-industry collaboration. However, categorizing size as a dichotomous dummy variable of SME and large firms showed an inverse relationship, while actual employment size was not statistically significant. Size was inversely correlated with university-industry collaboration. Separate Probit estimations for the specific industries of automotive, biotechnology and electronics indicate the following as the important drivers. First, R&D intensity, importance of university as a source of knowledge and age were important in automotive firms. Second, R&D intensity, channels of R&D information and R&D partner diversity were important in biotechnology firms. Third, the channels of R&D information and R&D partner diversity were important in electronics firms. Size was statistically significant in automotive and electronics firms but the coefficients were negative when a dummy was used and not statistically significant when the actual employment was used. Closer examination showed higher university-industry collaboration means among medium size firms.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 550
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    Khodabandehloo, Akbar
    CONFRONTING CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS CHALLENGES THROUGH MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, 2013, : 1247 - 1260
  • [32] The Complementarity Investment in University-Industry Collaboration
    Sun, Jeffrey C.
    Turner, Heather A.
    INNOVATIVE HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 48 (03) : 539 - 556
  • [33] A PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION
    Seres, Laslo
    Pavlicevic, Veselin
    Tumbas, Pere
    Matkovic, Predrag
    Maric, Mirjana
    EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 9664 - 9672
  • [34] ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION
    Tumbas, Pere
    Matkovic, Predrag
    Maric, Mirjana
    Pavlicevic, Veselin
    EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 2769 - 2776
  • [35] University-industry collaboration in the pharmaceutical sciences
    Breimer, DD
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 1996, 1 (10) : 403 - 403
  • [36] The contrasting interaction effects of university-industry collaboration motivation with demographic characteristics on university-industry collaboration performance in Taiwan
    Huang, Ching-Ying
    Yang, Chen-Wei
    Fang, Shih-Chieh
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2019, 31 (09) : 1048 - 1062
  • [37] University-Industry Linkages in the Support of Biotechnology Discoveries
    Jensen, Richard A.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 8, 2016, 8 : 377 - 396
  • [38] Does University-Industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese Firms
    Shi, Xing
    Wu, Yanrui
    Fu, Dahai
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 86 : 39 - 53
  • [39] The Status and Characteristics of University-Industry Collaboration in a Research University
    Abu Mansor, Nur Naha
    Rahman, Azlan Abdul
    Khademi, Tayebeh
    Shafaghat, Arezou
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 74 (04): : 135 - 139
  • [40] INFLUENCE OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION ON FIRMS' PERFORMANCE: COMPARISON BETWEEN CZECH AND SLOVAK INDUSTRIES
    Prokop, Viktor
    Stejskal, Jan
    ICERI2015: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2015, : 8153 - 8161