INTERINDIVIDUAL DISTANCES IN MIXED-SPECIES GROUPS OF ANTS - AN ESTIMATION OF COHESION IN SOCIAL-GROUPS

被引:3
|
作者
ERRARD, C
LENOIR, A
机构
[1] Laboratoire d'Ethologie Expérimentale et Comparée, URA CNRS 667, Université Paris-Nord, Villetaneuse
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02352567
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Spatial organization was estimated in mixed-species groups of ants with interindividual distance measures as a function of: (1) the age of the workers when associated; and (2) the presence of the brood. Workers of Manica rubida (Myrmicinae) and Formica selysi (Formicinae) were reared in single-species groups (control) or in artificial, mixed-species groups, created 5 h, 12 h or 22 h after emergence, with or without brood. By recording the location of each individual in the nest during the 10 days following the creation of the groups, we evaluated the spatial organization and the interindividual distances between homocolonial or allospecific workers, and between workers and homocolonial or allospecific brood. The cohesion of the group, depend on the age of the workers when associated: the younger the individuals are when the groups are created, the smaller are the interindividual distances. Moreover, homocolonial individuals aggregated with brood, when present, which improves the overall cohesion of the group. However, in mixed groups, both species associated preferentially with members of their own species. This suggests that newly-emerged ants do not depend totally on the odors of their nestmates to construct their recognition template and that they also possess an innate, specific template.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREY SELECTION BY PLOVERS - OPTIMAL FORAGING IN MIXED-SPECIES GROUPS
    THOMPSON, DBA
    BARNARD, CJ
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1984, 32 (MAY) : 554 - 563
  • [22] Foraging behaviour of an omnivorous bird varies in mixed-species groups
    Diniz, Pedro
    Valls, Jose F. M.
    Ramos, Desiree M.
    ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 35 (05) : 513 - 529
  • [23] ON THE SOCIOLOGY OF MUSICAL PRACTICE AND SOCIAL-GROUPS
    ETZKORN, KP
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1982, 34 (04) : 555 - 569
  • [24] AN IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR PRIMATES IN SOCIAL-GROUPS
    SPELMAN, FA
    JONES, RJ
    BOWDEN, DM
    SPILLANE, JE
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1980, 25 (01) : 147 - 149
  • [25] PARTY SYSTEMS AND THE REPRESENTATION OF SOCIAL-GROUPS
    LIPSET, SM
    ARCHIVES EUROPEENNES DE SOCIOLOGIE, 1960, 1 (01): : 50 - 85
  • [26] PERCEPTION OF DEVIANCE BY DIFFERENT SOCIAL-GROUPS
    SELIH, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF LAW, 1979, 7 (01): : 85 - 97
  • [27] LANGUAGE IN SOCIAL-GROUPS - GUMPERZ,JJ
    SVEJCER, AD
    LINGUISTICS, 1975, (147) : 81 - 85
  • [28] Mixed company: a framework for understanding the composition and organization of mixed-species animal groups
    Goodale, Eben
    Sridhar, Hari
    Sieving, Kathryn E.
    Bangal, Priti
    Colorado Z., Gabriel J.
    Farine, Damien R.
    Heymann, Eckhard W.
    Jones, Harrison H.
    Krams, Indrikis
    Martinez, Ari E.
    Montano-Centellas, Flavia
    Munoz, Jenny
    Srinivasan, Umesh
    Theo, Anne
    Shanker, Kartik
    BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2020, 95 (04) : 889 - 910
  • [29] THE CONSOLIDATION OF DEMOCRACY AND REPRESENTATION OF SOCIAL-GROUPS
    SCHMITTER, PC
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1992, 35 (4-5) : 422 - 449
  • [30] NETWORK MODEL OF INTERACTING SOCIAL-GROUPS
    EGRI, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1978, 9 (09) : 995 - 1005