IDENTIFICATION OF NONLINEAR MODEL OF ANKLE JOINT DYNAMICS DURING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF SOLEUS

被引:5
|
作者
FLAHERTY, B
ROBINSON, C
AGARWAL, G
机构
[1] EDWARD HINES VET ADM MED CTR,CTR REHABIL RES & DEV,HINES,IL
[2] LOYOLA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT NEUROL,MAYWOOD,IL
[3] UNIV ILLINOIS,DEPT ELECT ENGN & COMP SCI,CHICAGO,IL
关键词
FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; JOINT COMPLIANCE; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF02510527
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The mechanical impedance of-the ankle joint was estimated in two conditions: during submaximal surface electrical stimulation of the soleus muscle, and with no stimulation applied. Both neurologically intact (n = 5) and spinal cord injured subjects (n = 4) were used. The mechanical impedance was measured by applying angular step and constant velocity (13-100 degrees s(-1)) perturbations at 10 degrees to the ankle and measuring the resulting changes in torque. A five-element lumped model consisting of an inertial element, a parallel elastic element, and an elastic element in series with a viscous element and a pure tension generator produced a good fit for predicting the compliance characteristics of the ankle for both the relaxed and stimulated conditions. The elastic elements were piecewise linear with different values for the dorsiflexion and plantarflexion directions. The viscous element was velocity-dependent and it decreased in value as the velocity increased. The average torque error between the measured and model's response during soleus stimulation was 10.56% for the dorsiflexed and 11.93% for the plantarflexed perturbations. However, the average error was skewed by several subjects who had excessive error, due to volitional intervention or flexor withdrawal reflex. The average model error for the perturbations without stimulation was 7.12% for dorsiflexed and 5.58% for plantarflexed perturbations.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 439
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FATE OF IRON DEPOSITED IN HYPOTHALAMUS DURING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    CLARK, JS
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1978, 277 (APR): : P18 - P19
  • [32] ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF MEDULLA OBLONGATA DURING RESPIRATION IN RABBITS
    FALLERT, M
    EXPERIENTIA, 1973, 29 (06): : 742 - 742
  • [33] ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION INDUCED SPHINCTER FATIGUE DURING VOIDING
    LI, JS
    HASSOUNA, M
    SAWAN, M
    DUVAL, F
    ELHILALI, MM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03): : 949 - 952
  • [34] THE EFFECT OF IMMOBILIZATION ON THE RECOVERY OF RABBIT SOLEUS MUSCLE FROM TENOTOMY - MODULATION BY CHRONIC ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    BARRY, JA
    COTTER, MA
    CAMERON, NE
    PATTULLO, MC
    EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 79 (04) : 515 - 525
  • [35] IDENTIFICATION OF THE MOTOR LARYNGEAL NERVES - A NEW ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION TECHNIQUE
    SPAHN, JG
    BIZAL, J
    FERGUSON, S
    LINGEMAN, RE
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1981, 91 (11): : 1865 - 1868
  • [36] ROUTINE IDENTIFICATION OF THE FACIAL-NERVE USING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION DURING OTOLOGICAL AND NEUROTOLOGICAL SURGERY
    SILVERSTEIN, H
    SMOUHA, E
    JONES, R
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1988, 98 (07): : 726 - 730
  • [37] A MODEL OF THRESHOLD FOR PULSATILE ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    SHANNON, RV
    HEARING RESEARCH, 1989, 40 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [38] VISUAL-SPATIAL GNOSIS DYNAMICS DURING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF DAMAGED PARIETOOCCIPITAL HUMAN CORTEX
    SHANDURINA, AN
    NIKOLSKAYA, IM
    PERCEPTION, 1990, 19 (02) : 279 - 279
  • [39] EFFECTS OF JOINT ANGLE, ELECTRODES AND WAVEFORM ON ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE QUADRICEPS AND HAMSTRINGS
    MCNEAL, DR
    BAKER, LL
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1988, 16 (03) : 299 - 310
  • [40] OPTIMIZING ELECTRODE PLACEMENTS AND JOINT ANGLE FOR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION PROGRAMS AT THE KNEE
    MCNEAL, DR
    BAKER, LL
    HAMMER, D
    MARTIN, C
    MORI, K
    OBRIEN, C
    PITMAN, S
    VANDERHOEVEN, N
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1986, 66 (05): : 807 - 807