An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging for digital scholarship

被引:13
|
作者
Heap, Tania [1 ]
Minocha, Shailey [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Ctr Res Educ & Educ Technol, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
[2] Open Univ, Dept Comp, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
关键词
academic blogging; research blogging; openness; digital scholarship; open scholarship;
D O I
10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19195
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This research project investigated how openness and sharing of knowledge are manifested through scholarly blogging. We aimed to identify the academics' and researchers' motivations for starting a blog; the contribution of blogging to their personal and professional development; and any challenges. Twenty-six participants were recruited. A pre-interview questionnaire was first emailed to the participants to collect background information. An initial unstructured interview was conducted by email, followed by a synchronous semi-structured interview. Textual and visual extracts of blog content were also collected. The datasets were analysed using different techniques. The findings revealed varied reasons for blogging. Some academics/researchers began a blog for its accessibility to self and others. Blogging aided the academics' and researchers' personal and professional development in several ways. Bloggers can quickly reach a wider audience compared to other forms of academic publishing. Among the challenges, there were concerns over validity of online content. Based on previous scholarship models and on our findings, we have derived an empirically grounded framework of blog use in academia and research. The framework describes how characteristics of digital scholarship such as openness and sharing are manifested through blogging. The framework can be used to guide academics and researchers who are interested in taking up blogging as a scholarly practice.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 188
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education
    Kerawalla, L.
    Minocha, S.
    Kirkup, G.
    Conole, G.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2009, 25 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [2] Learning Progressions: An Empirically Grounded, Learner-Centered Framework to Guide Biology Instruction
    Scott, Emily E.
    Wenderoth, Mary Pat
    Doherty, Jennifer H.
    CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2019, 18 (04):
  • [3] Empirically grounded universals
    Wierzbicka, Anna
    TEKSTY DRUGIE, 2011, (1-2): : 13 - 30
  • [4] SERVING AGED IN PUBLIC-HOUSING - EMPIRICALLY GROUNDED CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
    HAREL, Z
    GERONTOLOGIST, 1973, 13 (03): : 93 - 93
  • [5] An Empirically Grounded Framework That Evaluates Argument Quality in Scientific and Social Contexts
    Hui Jin
    Duanli Yan
    Cathy E. Mehl
    Kenneth Llort
    Wenju Cui
    International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2021, 19 : 681 - 700
  • [6] An Empirically Grounded Framework That Evaluates Argument Quality in Scientific and Social Contexts
    Jin, Hui
    Yan, Duanli
    Mehl, Cathy E.
    Llort, Kenneth
    Cui, Wenju
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2021, 19 (04) : 681 - 700
  • [7] Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed
    Mansilla, Veronica Boix
    Duraising, Elizabeth Dawes
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2007, 78 (02): : 215 - +
  • [8] Desirable Characteristics and Competencies of Supported Employment Specialists: An Empirically-Grounded Framework
    Whitley, Rob
    Kostick, Kristin M.
    Bush, Philip W.
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (06) : 509 - 519
  • [9] An empirically-developed framework for Agile transition and adoption: A Grounded Theory approach
    Gandomani, Taghi Javdani
    Nafchi, Mina Ziaei
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2015, 107 : 204 - 219
  • [10] Desirable Characteristics and Competencies of Supported Employment Specialists: An Empirically-Grounded Framework
    Rob Whitley
    Kristin M. Kostick
    Philip W. Bush
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2010, 37 : 509 - 519