Boards attributes that increase firm risk - evidence from the UK

被引:38
|
作者
Mathew, Sudha [1 ]
Ibrahim, Salma [2 ]
Archbold, Stuart [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Westminster, Dept Accounting Finance & Governance, London W1R 8AL, England
[2] Univ Kingston, Dept Accounting Finance & Informat, London, England
[3] Univ Kingston, Dept Finance Accounting & Informat, London, England
关键词
Board composition; Decision making; Firm risk; UK corporate governance;
D O I
10.1108/CG-09-2015-0122
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify the board attributes that significantly increase firm risk. The study aims to find whether board size, percentage of non-executive directors, women on the board, a powerful chief executive officer, equity ownership amongst executive board directors and institutional investor ownership are associated with firm risk. This is the first study that examines which board attributes increase firm risk using a UK-based sample. Design/methodology/approach - This empirical study collected secondary data from Bloomberg and Morningstar databases. The data sample is an unbalanced panel of 260 companies' secondary data on FTSE 350 index in the UK, from 2005 to 2010. The data were statistically analysed using STATA. Findings - The study establishes the board attributes that were significantly related to firm risk. The results show that a board which can increase firm risk is one that is small in size, has high equity ownership amongst executive board directors and has high institutional investor ownership. Research limitations/implications - The governance culture and regulatory system in the UK is different from other countries. As the data are a UK-based sample, the results can lack generalisability. Practical implications - The results are useful for investors who invest in large firms, to have the knowledge about the board attributes that can increase firm risk. Regulators can also use the results to strengthen regulatory guidelines. Originality/value - This study fills the gap in knowledge in UK governance literature on the board attributes that can increase firm risk.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 258
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gender diversity and firm value: evidence from UK financial institutions
    Agyemang-Mintah, Peter
    Schadewitz, Hannu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 27 (01) : 2 - 26
  • [42] Minimum wage increase and firm productivity: Evidence from the restaurant industry
    Kim, Hong Soon
    Jang, SooCheong
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 71 : 378 - 388
  • [43] Does bank ownership increase firm value? Evidence from China
    Lin, Xiaochi
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhu, Ning
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2009, 28 (04) : 720 - 737
  • [44] AUDIT QUALITY ATTRIBUTES AND FIRM PROFITABILITY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
    Aljaaidi, Khaled Salmen
    SMART-JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [45] The relationships among environmental management, firm value and other firm attributes: evidence from Chinese manufacturing industry
    Lu, Wei
    Wang, Wen-Jun
    Sulkowski, Adam J.
    Wu, Jia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 10 (01) : 78 - 95
  • [46] Bank Risk and Firm Investment: Evidence from Firm-Level Data
    Shamshur, Anastasiya
    Weill, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 63 (01) : 1 - 34
  • [47] Does hedging increase firm value? Evidence from French firms
    Ben Khediri, Karim
    Folus, Didier
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 17 (10) : 995 - 998
  • [48] Bank Risk and Firm Investment: Evidence from Firm-Level Data
    Anastasiya Shamshur
    Laurent Weill
    Journal of Financial Services Research, 2023, 63 : 1 - 34
  • [49] Foreign investments and firm risk: Evidence from Germany
    Likitwongkajon, Napaporn
    Vithessonthi, Chaiporn
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 59
  • [50] Firm Internationalization and Systematic Risk: Evidence from Taiwan
    Shyu, Yih-Wen
    On, Niky
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2008, : 23 - 26