EPICARDIAL MAPPING OF VENTRICULAR DEFIBRILLATION WITH MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS IN DOGS

被引:124
|
作者
ZHOU, XH
DAUBERT, JP
WOLF, PD
SMITH, WM
IDEKER, RE
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT MED,POB 3140,DURHAM,NC 27710
[2] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,DURHAM,NC 27710
[3] DUKE UNIV,ENGN RES CTR EMERGING CARDIOVASC TECHNOL,DURHAM,NC 27706
关键词
FIBRILLATION; DEFIBRILLATION; SHOCK WAVE-FORM; CARDIAC MAPPING; ACTIVATION PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1161/01.RES.72.1.145
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To study the mechanism of defibrillation and the reason for the increased defibrillation efficacy of biphasic waveforms, the potential gradient in a 32x30-mm region of the right ventricle in 15 dogs was progressively lowered in four steps while a strong potential gradient field was maintained throughout the rest of the ventricular myocardium. The volume of right ventricle beneath the plaque was 10+/-2% of the total ventricular mass. A 10-msec monophasic (eight dogs) or 5/5-msec biphasic (seven dogs) truncated exponential shock 30% above the defibrillation threshold voltage was given via electrodes on the left ventricular apex and right atrium to create the strong potential gradient field. Simultaneously, a weaker shock with the same waveform but opposite polarity was given via mesh electrodes on either side of the small right ventricular region to cancel part of the potential difference in the region and to create one of the four levels of potential gradient fields. Shock potentials and activations were recorded from 117 epicardial electrodes in the small region, and in one dog global epicardial activations and potentials were recorded from a sock containing 72 electrodes. Each gradient field was tested 10 times for successful defibrillation after 10 seconds of electrically induced fibrillation. For both monophasic and biphasic shocks, the percentage of successful defibrillation attempts decreased (p<0.05) as the potential gradient decreased in the small region. Defibrillation was successful approximately 80% of the time for a mean+/-SD potential gradient of 5.4+/-0.8 V/cm for monophasic shocks and 2.7+/-0.3 V/cm for biphasic shocks (p<0.05). No postshock activation fronts arose from the small region for either waveform when the gradient was more than 5 V/cm. For both waveforms, the postshock activation fronts after the shocks were markedly different from those just before the shock and exhibited either a focal origin or unidirectional conduction. Thus, 1) for both monophasic and biphasic waveforms, defibrillation efficacy depends on the potential gradient fields; 2) a low potential gradient in approximately 10% of the ventricular mass can cause defibrillation to fail, suggesting that the critical mass for defibrillation is over 90% of the ventricular mass in dogs; 3) this low gradient field halts the activation fronts during fibrillation and then leads to new activation fronts to reinduce fibrillation; 4) postshock activation fronts are prevented by a potential gradient of more than 5 V/cm for both waveforms; and 5) the strength of the minimum potential gradient field required for defibrillation is less for the biphasic waveform.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 160
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARISON OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS IN CARDIOVERSION OF VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA IN THE CANINE INFARCT MODEL
    CALLIHAN, RL
    WALCOTT, GP
    SMITH, WM
    IDEKER, RE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, : A208 - A208
  • [42] Theoretical predictions of the optimal monophasic and biphasic defibrillation waveshapes
    Fishler, MG
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 47 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [43] Effects of biphasic vs monophasic defibrillation on the scaling exponent in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation
    Wang, HE
    Menegazzi, JJ
    Lightfoot, CB
    Callaway, CW
    Fertig, KC
    Sherman, LD
    Hsieh, M
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (08) : 771 - 780
  • [44] Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation
    Leng, CT
    Paradis, NA
    Calkins, H
    Berger, RD
    Lardo, AC
    Rent, KC
    Halperin, HR
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (25) : 2968 - 2974
  • [45] MECHANISMS OF DEFIBRILLATION FOR MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC WAVE-FORMS
    WALCOTT, GP
    WALCOTT, KT
    KNISLEY, SB
    ZHOU, XH
    IDEKER, RE
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (03): : 478 - 498
  • [46] EFFECTS OF MAGNESIUM ON MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION IN A CANINE MODEL
    THAKUR, RK
    SOUZA, JJ
    KOMOROWSKI, RA
    TROUP, PJ
    CHAPMAN, PD
    WETHERBEE, JN
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (04): : A890 - A890
  • [47] COMPARISON OF MONOPHASIC, BIPHASIC, AND SEQUENTIAL PULSES FOR INTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION
    PETERSON, P
    THAKUR, RK
    SOUZA, JJ
    WETHERBEE, JN
    CHAPMAN, PD
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 38 (03): : A810 - A810
  • [48] RELATION BETWEEN SHOCK-RELATED MYOCARDIAL INJURY AND DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS IN A CANINE MODEL
    OSSWALD, S
    TROUTON, TG
    ONUNAIN, SS
    HOLDEN, HB
    RUSKIN, JN
    GARAN, H
    CIRCULATION, 1994, 90 (05) : 2501 - 2509
  • [49] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC WAVE-FORM SHOCKS USING A BRAIDED ENDOCARDIAL DEFIBRILLATION LEAD SYSTEM
    SAKSENA, S
    SCOTT, SE
    ACCORTI, PR
    BOVEJA, BK
    ABELS, D
    CALLAGHAN, FJ
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1990, 120 (06) : 1342 - 1347
  • [50] Lower current density ventricular defibrillation thresholds with dual pathway rectilinear biphasic shocks
    Niebauer, MJ
    Lof, J
    Stolze, E
    Westphal, S
    Andersen, G
    Missoi, A
    Petrocchi, M
    Brewer, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 111A - 111A