A "Definition" of Laws? Montesquieu and the Laws-Without-Law

被引：0
|
作者：
Gazzolo, Tommaso [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sassari, Dipartimento Giurisprudenza, Filosofia Diritto Presso, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
来源：
ARAUCARIA-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA POLITICA Y HUMANIDADES | 2016年 / 18卷 / 36期
关键词：
Laws; Definition; relations; deriver; nature of things;
D O I：
10.12795/araucaria.2016.i36.09
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
This paper discusses the meaning of Montesquieu's concept of laws as the "necessary relations derived from the nature of things". Specifically, we will try to show that Montesquieu does not give a definition, because laws, as relations, are not things, substances or something definable. In order to have their own meaning laws must have no "meaning", no finality, no definition.
引用
收藏
页码：189 / 208
页数：20
相关论文
共 50 条
12345