CASES ON FLOWER BOND VALIDITY, VALUATION APPEAR

被引:0
|
作者
不详
机构
来源
JOURNAL OF TAXATION | 1978年 / 49卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 273
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validity of the sensory evaluation scales for fresh flower scent
    Morinaka, Y
    Handa, T
    Takeuchi, H
    Ayabe-Kanamura, S
    Saito, S
    JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2001, 70 (05): : 636 - 649
  • [42] ECONOMIC VALUATION OF MODEL CASES OF RAINWATER UTILIZATION
    Brecklova, Veronika
    Gebeltova, Zdenka
    AGRARIAN PERSPECTIVES XXIX: TRENDS AND CHALLENGES OF AGRARIAN SECTOR, 2020, : 66 - 74
  • [43] Data Valuation: Use Cases, Desiderata, and Approaches
    Fleckenstein, Mike
    Obaidi, Ali
    Tryfona, Nektaria
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND ACM DATA ECONOMY WORKSHOP, DEC 2023, 2023, : 48 - 52
  • [44] Capital-stock Valuation in Tax Cases
    Burrell, O. K.
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1930, 49 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [45] Promoting fairness in English insolvency valuation cases
    Vaccari, Eugenio
    INTERNATIONAL INSOLVENCY REVIEW, 2020, 29 (02) : 285 - 312
  • [46] The validity of marriage in cases of captivity
    Dunn, Geoffrey D.
    EPHEMERIDES THEOLOGICAE LOVANIENSES, 2007, 83 (01): : 107 - 121
  • [47] The Brief Neuropsychological Screening (BNS): valuation of its clinical validity
    Lunardelli, A.
    Mengotti, P.
    Pesavento, V.
    Sverzut, A.
    Zadini, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 45 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [48] Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation
    Poe, GL
    Clark, JE
    Rondeau, D
    Schulze, WD
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 23 (01): : 105 - 131
  • [49] Evaluating the validity of the dichotomous choice question format in contingent valuation
    Loomis, John
    Brown, Thomas
    Lucero, Beatrice
    Peterson, George
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 10 (02): : 109 - 123
  • [50] VALIDITY OF WAIVERS IN DISCRIMINATION CASES
    ALSHER, BD
    LABOR LAW JOURNAL, 1991, 42 (02) : 81 - 92