STROOP PROCESS DISSOCIATIONS - THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE

被引:286
|
作者
LINDSAY, DS [1 ]
JACOBY, LL [1 ]
机构
[1] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,HAMILTON L8S 4L8,ONTARIO,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.219
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
L. L. Jacoby's (1991) ''process dissociation procedure'' was used to quantitatively estimate the contributions of color-naming and word-reading processes to responding on the Stroop task. The results show that color naming and word reading can operate independently to determine responses. Degrading stimulus colors eliminated the typical asymmetry between Stroop facilitation and interference, as predicted by the equations (Experiments 1 and 2). Degrading stimulus colors reduced the estimated contribution of color naming to responding but had no effect on the estimated contribution of word reading (Experiment 2). In contrast, increasing the proportion of incongruent items reduced the estimated contribution of word reading but had no effect on the estimated contribution of color naming (Experiments 3 and 4). The results indicate that the facilitating and interfering effects of automatic processes cannot be accurately measured in terms of differences from baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 234
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stroop/Reverse-Stroop interference in developmental disorder
    Song, Yongning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 159 - 159
  • [42] Stroop interference effects in partially colored Stroop words
    Danziger, S
    Estévez, AF
    Marí-Beffa, P
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2002, 9 (03) : 536 - 541
  • [43] Different Measures of Auditory and Visual Stroop Interference and Their Relationship to Speech Intelligibility in Noise
    Knight, Sarah
    Heinrich, Antje
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [44] DIFFERENTIAL NEURAL PROCESSING OF NEGATIVE STIMULI IN INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCING FACILITATION VS. INTERFERENCE IN AN EMOTIONAL STROOP TASK
    Ellis, Lesa K.
    Choles, Jaiya R.
    Naylor, Emilee R.
    Green, Danielle J.
    Costa, Russell E.
    Simonds, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, : 67 - 67
  • [45] Strategies that reduce Stroop interference
    Palfi, B.
    Parris, B. A.
    Collins, A. F.
    Dienes, Z.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (03):
  • [46] LOCUS OF INTERFERENCE ON STROOP TEST
    WHEELER, DD
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1977, 45 (01) : 263 - 266
  • [47] Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: Evidence for dissociations between macrolevel and microlevel performance
    Dyson, Benjamin J.
    Quinlan, Philip T.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (06) : 1676 - 1691
  • [48] PRIMING EFFECT ON STROOP INTERFERENCE
    CHIHARA, T
    PSYCHOLOGIA, 1988, 31 (03) : 136 - 145
  • [49] Proofreaders' decreased Stroop interference
    Borzoni, S
    Hines, T
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1996, 82 (03) : 1104 - 1106
  • [50] Stroop interference, practice, and aging
    Davidson, DJ
    Zacks, RT
    Williams, CC
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2003, 10 (02) : 85 - 98