ON DURATION OF THINKING IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES

被引:0
|
作者
Yevgeniy, Malyshkin, V [1 ]
机构
[1] St Petersburg State Univ, St Petersburg, Russia
来源
关键词
duration; memory; demonstration of God's existence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The article investigates the hypothesis of a weakened position of God in Descartes' project of philosophy. If God is the one who holds all things in being, including the thinking ones (res cogitans), then the weakening of His position calls into question the notion of duration (duratio), which Descartes did not define in details. We investigate this concept. If we accept the assertion of Descartes that God supports us from moment to moment (this produces duration), then two problems arise: 1) whom God's support is directed to: the thinking thing or the "complete" substance, i.e. the composite of body and mind; 2) if the support is still focused on the being of a thinking thing, then the latter can not be described in terms of time, because time is a measure of movement, but thinking is motionless; 3) if keeping in being is described in terms of power, or effort, then what it can be compared to? The answer to the first question is the consideration that as God's support is not tangible and does not depend on any finite subjects, then He supports us not as substances, but as conservatum. The second problem is clearly solved by the fact that we must interpret the moments not as moments of time, but as moments of duration; and the moment of duration is a force, which holds us in being. Therefore, the answer to the second question depends entirely on the solution of the third one. To answer it, we turn to the Cartesian construction "just a conceivable distinction", which indicates the possibility of perception of false beings. This "zero degree of objectivity" helps up to make a comparison with the force of holding in being. The phenomenon, which appears as a result of this analysis, namely, to focus attention on the things known to be false, plays a significant role in the structure of duration. The context in which particular importance of memory is detected is that it is a witness of insignificant being, which non-existent items obviously are. It is concluded that in the structure of Cartesian metaphysics memory plays an invisible, but crucial role.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Descartes and Philosophy
    v Gebsattel
    NERVENARZT, 1938, 11 (05): : 257 - 257
  • [2] Descartes and the Philosophy
    Dr Illemann
    ARCHIV FUR DIE GESAMTE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1938, 102 (01): : 175 - 176
  • [3] The philosophy of Descartes
    Pellegrin, Marie-Frederique
    REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LA FRANCE ET DE L ETRANGER, 2020, 145 (01): : 76 - 78
  • [4] On the passive thinking of Descartes
    Raga Rosaleny, Vicente
    ENDOXA-SERIES FILOSOFICAS, 2019, (43): : 347 - 352
  • [5] DESCARTES AND THINKING COMPUTERS
    TROTTER, W
    DATAMATION, 1984, 30 (04): : 15 - 15
  • [6] The medical philosophy of Descartes
    Bitbol-Hesperies, Annie
    GESNERUS-SWISS JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCES, 2010, 67 (01): : 115 - 116
  • [7] New Studies in the Philosophy of Descartes: Descartes as a Pioneer
    Gross, Mason W.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1954, 293 : 194 - 195
  • [8] Descartes on the Practice of Philosophy
    Morris, Courtney
    TEACHING PHILOSOPHY, 2024, 47 (04) : 569 - 587
  • [9] Descartes and moral philosophy
    Pellegrin, Marie-Frederique
    REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LA FRANCE ET DE L ETRANGER, 2011, 136 (04): : 576 - 577
  • [10] Medical philosophy of Descartes
    Smith, Justin E. H.
    ISIS, 2007, 98 (03) : 623 - 625