QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE EVALUATION OF THE ROMANIAN FARM BEHAVIOR THROUGH TECHNICAL ENDOWMENT INDICATORS

被引：0
|
作者：
Rusali, Mirela [1 ]
Gavrila, Viorica [1 ]
机构：
[1] Romanian Acad, Inst Agr Econ, 13,Calea 13 Septembrie,Sector 5, Bucharest, Romania
来源：
SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT | 2009年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词：
agricultural holding; technical endowment; sustainability;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号：
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要：
The technical production potential is a determining factor of the economic viability of agricultural holdings, contributing to sector sustainability in time. The future economic development of the agricultural holding and, implicitly, the possibility of sound soil management, largely depend on the quantitative, structural and qualitative evolution of the fixed capital. The paper presents the results of a field survey conducted on agricultural holdings, concerning similar aspects of farm management, by supplying quantitative and qualitative evaluation indicators of the behaviour of Romanian agricultural holdings with regard to the technical farm endowment with animal shelters and agricultural mechanization means.
引用
收藏
页码：121 / 124
页数：4
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Application Specific Performance Indicators for Quantitative Evaluation of the Timing Behavior for Embedded Real-Time Systems
    Koenig, Frank
    Boers, Dave
    Slomka, Frank
    Margull, Ulrich
    Niemetz, Michael
    Wirrer, Gerhard
    DATE: 2009 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 519 - +
  • [22] Performance Indicators for Depression Management in UK Primary Care: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of the Use of Depression Symptom Questionnaire PROMs
    Kendrick, Tony
    Moore, Michael
    Leydon, Geraldine
    Dowrick, Christopher
    Howe, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 17 : S10 - S11
  • [23] Understanding User Behavior in Car Sharing Services Through The Lens of Mobility: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
    Wang, Guang
    Vaish, Harsh Rajkumar
    Sun, Huijun
    Wu, Jianjun
    Wang, Shuai
    Zhang, Desheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON INTERACTIVE MOBILE WEARABLE AND UBIQUITOUS TECHNOLOGIES-IMWUT, 2020, 4 (04):
  • [24] Indicators of empowerment and disempowerment in the subjective evaluation of the psychiatric treatment process by persons with severe and persistent mental illness:: a qualitative and quantitative analysis
    Kilian, R
    Lindenbach, I
    Löbig, U
    Uhle, M
    Petscheleit, A
    Angermeyer, MC
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (06) : 1127 - 1142
  • [25] Diagnosis of degradation state of the historic building facade through qualitative and quantitative indicators: case study of the Former School of Agronomy Eliseu Maciel
    Silveira da Costa, Vitoria
    da Silva Torres, Ariela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILDING PATHOLOGY AND ADAPTATION, 2023, 41 (04) : 734 - 766
  • [26] Relationship between microscopic analysis and quantitative and qualitative indicators of moisture susceptibility evaluation of warm-mix asphalt mixtures containing modifiers
    Farazmand, Pooyan
    Hayati, Parham
    Shaker, Hamid
    Rezaei, Sajad
    FRATTURA ED INTEGRITA STRUTTURALE, 2020, 14 (51): : 215 - 224
  • [27] Rapid health evaluation in migrant peoples in transit through Darien, Panama: protocol for a multimethod qualitative and quantitative study
    Gabster, Amanda
    Jhangimal, Monica
    Erausquin, Jennifer Toller
    Suarez, Jose Antonio
    Pinzon-Espinosa, Justo
    Baird, Madeline
    Katz, Jennifer
    Beltran-Henriquez, Davis
    Cabezas-Talavero, Gonzalo
    Henao-Martinez, Andres F.
    Franco-Paredes, Carlos
    Agudelo-Higuita, Nelson, I
    Pachar, Monica
    Gonzalez, Jose Anel
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    Pascale, Juan Miguel
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 8
  • [28] Discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative evaluation of randomised controlled trial results: achieving clarity through mixed methods triangulation
    Sarah Tonkin-Crine
    Sibyl Anthierens
    Kerenza Hood
    Lucy Yardley
    Jochen W. L. Cals
    Nick A. Francis
    Samuel Coenen
    Alike W. van der Velden
    Maciek Godycki-Cwirko
    Carl Llor
    Chris C. Butler
    Theo J. M. Verheij
    Herman Goossens
    Paul Little
    Implementation Science, 11
  • [29] Evaluation of the Accessibility of Selected Packaging by Comparison of Quantitative Measurements of the Opening Forces and Qualitative Surveys through Focus Group Studies
    Wenk, Susanna
    Brombach, Christine
    Artigas, Gracia
    Jarvenpaa, Eila
    Steinemann, Nina
    Ziesemer, Katrin
    Yildirim, Selcuk
    PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2016, 29 (11) : 559 - 570
  • [30] Discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative evaluation of randomised controlled trial results: achieving clarity through mixed methods triangulation
    Tonkin-Crine, Sarah
    Anthierens, Sibyl
    Hood, Kerenza
    Yardley, Lucy
    Cals, Jochen W. L.
    Francis, Nick A.
    Coenen, Samuel
    van der Velden, Alike W.
    Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
    Llor, Carl
    Butler, Chris C.
    Verheij, Theo J. M.
    Goossens, Herman
    Little, Paul
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
12345