The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services

被引:160
|
作者
Engel, Stefanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Osnabruck, Environm Econ, Osnabruck, Germany
来源
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS | 2015年 / 9卷 / 1-2期
关键词
Payments for Environmental Services; Ecosystem Services; PES; Policy Design;
D O I
10.1561/101.00000076
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Payments for environmental services (PES) have become a popular approach to address environmental degradation. However, evidence on its effectiveness is scarce and rather mixed. PES is not a panacea, but there are many cases where PES can be a promising tool. Yet, poor PES design translates into poor performance of the instrument. PES design is a complex task; the devil is in the detail of a number of PES design features. The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance in dealing with this complexity through a comprehensive review of PES design that is accessible to both academics and practitioners. Practitioner guidelines on deciding whether PES is the best approach and for selecting among alternative design features are presented. PES design has to start from a careful understanding of the specific ecological and socio-economic context. We now know a lot about which design features are best suited to which context. It is time to put these insights into practice.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 177
页数:47
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor?
    Zilberman, David
    Lipper, Leslie
    Mccarthy, Nancy
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2008, 13 : 255 - 278
  • [32] Payments for environmental services (PES): contribution to Indigenous livelihoods
    Greiner, R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENT ASSESSMENT III, 2010, 131 : 163 - 174
  • [33] Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services
    Ferraro, Paul J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (04) : 810 - 821
  • [34] Differentiated payments for environmental services schemes: Amethodology proposal
    Carlos R. Aguilar-Gómez
    Sergio Franco-Maass
    Tizbe T. Arteaga-Reyes
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2018, 15 : 1693 - 1710
  • [35] The effect of spatial interdependencies on prioritization and payments for environmental services
    Duke, Joshua M.
    Dundas, Steven J.
    Johnston, Robert J.
    Messer, Kent D.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 48 : 341 - 350
  • [36] Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials
    Wunder, Sven
    Boerner, Jan
    Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss
    Feder, Sarah
    Pagiola, Stefano
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 12, 2020, 12 : 209 - 234
  • [37] "Carbon rights", REDD plus and payments for environmental services
    Karsenty, Alain
    Vogel, Aurelie
    Castell, Frederic
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 35 : 20 - 29
  • [38] Differentiated payments for environmental services schemes: Amethodology proposal
    Aguilar-Gomez, Carlos R.
    Franco-Maass, Sergio
    Arteaga-Reyes, Tizbe T.
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2018, 15 (08) : 1693 - 1710
  • [39] "The devil's in the detail": Release of an expanded, enhanced and dynamically revised forensic STR Sequence Guide
    Phillips, C.
    Gettings, K. Butler
    King, J. L.
    Ballard, D.
    Bodner, M.
    Borsuk, L.
    Parson, W.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2018, 34 : 162 - 169
  • [40] Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services
    de Lima, Letica Santos
    Krueger, Tobias
    Garcia-Marquez, Jaime
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 27 : 139 - 149