When will China's carbon emissions peak? Evidence from judgment criteria and emissions reduction paths

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Ya [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Coll Econ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainable Dev, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emissions peak; Decoupling; Kaya model; Policy tool;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Scientifically judging the current state of carbon emissions in China and each province is a logical starting point for judging whether carbon emissions will peak or not by 2030. Using the Tapio decoupling model, this paper examines the carbon emissions peaking states of 30 provinces in China. The results show that carbon emissions in seven provinces including Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Jilin, Chongqing, Sichuan, and Heilongjiang have peaked; nine provinces including Zhejiang, Henan, Shaanxi, Hubei, Guizhou, Yunnan, Jiangsu, Hunan, and Qinghai have pseudo-peaks, that is, although carbon emissions have reached a peak for the moment, they may peak again in the future; carbon emissions in other provinces have not peaked. Further, this paper finds that the current emission reduction efforts are not enough to support the realization of the 2030 carbon emissions peaking goal through the Kaya model prediction. Among the provinces which have pseudo-peaks, Zhejiang, Guizhou, Shaanxi, and Jiangsu are more difficult to achieve peaking, while Henan, Hubei, Yunnan, and Qinghai perform better under the enhanced low-carbon scenario. Ningxia, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia are unlikely to reach their peaks in 2030 under any pre-set scenario.(C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:8722 / 8735
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] China’s carbon emissions could peak sooner than forecast
    Jeff Tollefson
    Nature, 2016, 531 : 425 - 425
  • [22] The empirical decomposition and peak path of China's tourism carbon emissions
    Ma, Xiaojun
    Han, Miaomiao
    Luo, Jian
    Song, Yanqi
    Chen, Ruimin
    Sun, Xueying
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (46) : 66448 - 66463
  • [23] China's carbon emissions could peak sooner than forecast
    Tollefson, Jeff
    NATURE, 2016, 531 (7595) : 425 - 426
  • [24] Digital government and carbon emissions: evidence from China
    Yi, Junling
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2025, 13
  • [25] Digital technology and carbon emissions: Evidence from China
    Zeng, Jingting
    Yang, Moru
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 430
  • [26] Environmental decentralization and carbon emissions: evidence from China
    Chao Xu
    Yilin Qi
    Yun Zhu
    Yumeng Pang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 123193 - 123213
  • [27] Land Misallocation and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China
    Han, Feng
    Huang, Min
    LAND, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [28] Environmental decentralization and carbon emissions: evidence from China
    Xu, Chao
    Qi, Yilin
    Zhu, Yun
    Pang, Yumeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (59) : 123193 - 123213
  • [29] Carbon Emissions Trading and Employment: Evidence from China
    Qiang, Mengmeng
    Lai, Hangyi
    Lyu, Zhenxi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (04)
  • [30] Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China: Estimation, Influencing Factors, and Projection of Peak Emissions
    Wu, Hui
    Yue, Yang
    Shen, Yang
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 33 (04): : 4791 - 4806