Safety and continuity of second- and third-line therapy with paclitaxel or irinotecan for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Kimura, Michio [1 ]
Usami, Eiseki [1 ]
Kanematsu, Tetsufumi [2 ]
Iwai, Mina [1 ]
Yoshimura, Tomoaki [1 ]
Mori, Hiromi [1 ]
Sugiyama, Tadashi [3 ]
Teramachi, Hitomi [4 ]
机构
[1] Ogaki Municipal Hosp, Dept Pharm, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu 5038502, Japan
[2] Gifu Social Insurance Hosp, Dept Pharm, Kani, Gifu 5090206, Japan
[3] Gifu Pharmaceut Univ, Lab Pharm Practice & Social Sci, Gifu 5011196, Japan
[4] Gifu Pharmaceut Univ, Lab Clin Pharm, Gifu 5011196, Japan
关键词
safety; continuity; paclitaxel; irinotecan; gastric cancer;
D O I
10.3892/mco.2014.260
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, the prolongation of survival depends on the use of second-line therapy, with paclitaxel (PTX) or irinotecan (CPT-11) as the key agents. The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate the safety and continuity of weekly PTX and CPT-11 monotherapy as second- or third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. A total of 62 patients who had received PTX or CPT-11 for gastric cancer at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 47 patients who received PTX as second-line therapy, 13 (27.7%) received third-line therapy with CPT-11. Second-line PTX and third-line CPT-11 were discontinued due to progressive disease (PD) in 27 and 7 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the performance status (PS) in 20 and 4 cases, respectively. Only 1 case of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) was reported for third-line CPT-11. Furthermore, of the 15 patients who received CPT-11 as second-line treatment, 11 (73.3%) then received PTX as third-line treatment. Second-line CPT-11 and third-line PTX were discontinued due to PD in 9 and 6 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the PS in 4 and 5 cases, respectively, whereas there was only 1 case of discontinuation due to AEs for second-line CPT-11. Severe AEs for PTX and CPT-11 were infrequent; however, the frequency of diarrhea was high when PTX was administered as third-line therapy (63.6%), whereas the frequency of malaise was high when CPT-11 was administered as second-(73.3%) and third-line (76.9%) therapy. In conclusion, severe AEs due to PTX and CPT-11 as second-and third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer are infrequent and patients are generally able to continue treatment. However, the possibility of diarrhea with third-line PTX and malaise with second- and third-line CPT-11 treatment should be considered when planning chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 472
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Second- and third-line systemic therapy in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review of the literature
    ter Veer, Emil
    Mohammad, Nadia Haj
    van Valkenhoef, Gert
    Ngai, Lok Lam
    Mali, Rosa M. A.
    van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2016, 35 (03) : 439 - 456
  • [12] Second- and third-line systemic therapy in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review of the literature
    Emil ter Veer
    Nadia Haj Mohammad
    Gert van Valkenhoef
    Lok Lam Ngai
    Rosa M. A. Mali
    Martijn G. H. van Oijen
    Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2016, 35 : 439 - 456
  • [13] Bi-weekly Paclitaxel and Capecitabine as a Second- or Third-line Treatment for Advanced Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko-Liiisa
    Tuunanen, Tuija
    Kautio, Anna-Liisa
    Lehtinen, Ilari
    Tanner, Minna
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (11) : 4941 - 4945
  • [14] Second- or third-line chemotherapy in NSCLC
    Sorensen, JB
    LUNG CANCER, 2004, 45 : S18 - S18
  • [15] Weekly topotecan as second- or third-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer
    Jaime Coronel
    Lucely Cetina
    Myrna Candelaria
    Aurora González-Fierro
    Daimy Arias
    David Cantu
    Alfonso Dueñas-González
    Medical Oncology, 2009, 26 : 210 - 214
  • [16] Weekly topotecan as second- or third-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer
    Coronel, Jaime
    Cetina, Lucely
    Candelaria, Myrna
    Gonzalez-Fierro, Aurora
    Arias, Daimy
    Cantu, David
    Duenas-Gonzalez, Alfonso
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 26 (02) : 210 - 214
  • [17] Everolimus and Erlotinib as Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Papadimitrakopoulou, Vassiliki A.
    Soria, Jean-Charles
    Jappe, Annette
    Jehl, Valentine
    Klimovsky, Judith
    Johnson, Bruce E.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (10) : 1594 - 1601
  • [18] Second- and third-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer with gemcitabine
    Brodowicz, T
    Möslinger, R
    Herscovici, V
    Vaclavik, I
    Wiltschke, C
    Kubista, E
    Zielinski, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 : S44 - S44
  • [19] Efficacy and Safety of Second- or Third-Line Nab-Paclitaxel plus Durvalumab in Patients with Advanced NSCLC (ABOUND.2L+)
    Morgensztern, D.
    Govindan, R.
    Cobo, M.
    Ponce Aix, S.
    Postmus, P. E.
    Lewanski, C.
    Bennouna, J.
    Fischer, J.
    Juan-Vidal, O.
    Stewart, D.
    Ardizzoni, A.
    Bhore, R.
    Wolfsteiner, M.
    Reck, M.
    Talbot, D.
    Ong, T. J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S489 - S489
  • [20] Cost-effectiveness of tisotumab vedotin as a second- or third-line therapy for cervical cancer
    Huo, Gengwei
    Liu, Wenjie
    Chen, Peng
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 (05)