VALIDITY OF THE SHELTERED CARE ENVIRONMENT SCALE - CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES
被引:5
|
作者:
LEMKE, S
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
VET ADM MED CTR,FAR W HLTH SERV,RES & DEV FIELD PROGRAM,PALO ALTO,CA 94304VET ADM MED CTR,FAR W HLTH SERV,RES & DEV FIELD PROGRAM,PALO ALTO,CA 94304
LEMKE, S
[1
]
MOOS, RH
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
VET ADM MED CTR,FAR W HLTH SERV,RES & DEV FIELD PROGRAM,PALO ALTO,CA 94304VET ADM MED CTR,FAR W HLTH SERV,RES & DEV FIELD PROGRAM,PALO ALTO,CA 94304
MOOS, RH
[1
]
机构:
[1] VET ADM MED CTR,FAR W HLTH SERV,RES & DEV FIELD PROGRAM,PALO ALTO,CA 94304
The Sheltered Care Environment Scale (SCES) was developed primarily to measure social climate as an attribute of a setting. As such, the SCES was designed to maximize differences between facilities and minimize differences among individuals within a setting. However, Smith and Whitbourne (1990) assessed the validity of the SCES as a measure of individual differences in perceptions of a shared environment. Moreover, they redefined the content coverage of 2 of the SCES subscales (Independence and Physical Comfort), to encompass attributes the SCES is not intended to measure. In general, preliminary evidence indicates that the SCES subscales provide reasonably reliable and valid indices of the social climate of group residential facilities.