Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology

被引:3
|
作者
Melzer, Andreas [1 ]
Gergs, Ulrich [2 ]
Lukas, Josef [1 ]
Neumann, Joachim [2 ]
机构
[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Psychol, D-06097 Halle, Germany
[2] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fac, Inst Pharmacol & Toxicol, D-06097 Halle, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2018/8615746
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Multiple-choice questions are widely used in clinical education. Usually, the students have to mark the one and only correct answer from a set of five alternatives. Here, in a voluntary exam, at the end of an obligatory pharmacology exam, we tested a format where more than one alternative could be correct (N = 544 students from three year groups). Moreover, the students were asked to rate each item. The students were unaware how many correct answers were contained in the questions. Finally, a questionnaire had to be filled out about the difficulty of the new tests compared to the one out of five tests. In the obligatory final exam, all groups performed similarly. From the results, we conclude that the new rating scales were a better challenge and could be adapted to assess student knowledge and confidence in more depth than previous multiple-choice questions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Self-Correcting Approach to Multiple-Choice Exams Improves Students' Learning
    Gruehn, Daniel
    Cheng, Yanhua
    TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 41 (04) : 335 - 339
  • [42] Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in Pharmacology in an Indian Medical School
    Adiga, Manoor Narasimha Sachidananda
    Acharya, Swathi
    Holla, Rajendra
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND ALLIED SCIENCES NU, 2021, 11 (03): : 130 - 135
  • [43] Evaluation of the Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Pediatric Exams: A College of Medicine Departmental Review
    Mustafa, Alam Eldin M.
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2024, 46 (03) : 2363 - 2369
  • [44] COMPARISONS OF PERFORMANCE IN PHARMACOLOGY EXAMINATIONS USING MULTIPLE-CHOICE AND ESSAY QUESTIONS
    HOULT, JRS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1976, 58 (02) : P306 - P307
  • [45] Experimental assessment of the performance of artificial intelligence in solving multiple-choice board exams in cardiology
    Huwiler, Jessica
    Oechslin, Luca
    Biaggi, Patric
    Tanner, Felix C.
    Wyss, Christophe Alain
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2024, 154
  • [46] Guess for Success? Application of a Mixture Model to Test-Wiseness on Multiple-Choice Exams
    Caudill, Steven B.
    Mixon Jr, Franklin G.
    STATS, 2023, 6 (03): : 734 - 739
  • [47] TEST-WISENESS STRATEGIES THAT STUDENTS USE TO ANSWER MULTIPLE-CHOICE CHEMISTRY EXAMS
    HAMBY, ML
    ROBINSON, WR
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 200 : 86 - CHED
  • [48] Multiple-Choice Exams: An Obstacle for Higher-Level Thinking in Introductory Science Classes
    Stanger-Hall, Kathrin F.
    CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2012, 11 (03): : 294 - 306
  • [49] Weighted Scoring of Multiple-choice Questions based Exams: Expert and Empirical Weighting Factors
    Photopoulos, Panagiotis
    Tsakiridis, Odysseus
    Stavrakas, Ilias
    Triantis, Dimos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION (CSEDU), VOL 1, 2020, : 382 - 387
  • [50] AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF MEASURES OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION ITEM DIFFICULTY
    Dickinson, John R.
    Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability-Things Change, Things Stay the Same..., 2015, : 327 - 328