Do People Value The Welfare Of Farm Animals?

被引:11
|
作者
Burgess, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Hutchinson, W. George. [3 ]
机构
[1] Dept Agr & Rural Dev, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Univ East Anglia, CSERGE, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Rural & Environm Econ, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1746-692X.2005.00016.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Public concern over farm animal welfare has led to the banning of a number of intensive farming methods such as sow stalls, battery cages (by 2012) and veal crates, and the development of high welfare status products sold at a price premium. This indicates that consumers value farm animal welfare. In addition satisfaction can also be derived, by consumers and non-consumers of animal products, from the knowledge that all animals are experiencing welfare-enhancing husbandry practices. Consequently farm animal welfare can be considered a complex good, sought partly for private consumption and as a public good. However, improving the welfare of all farm animals through legislation incurs costs - are these increased costs of food production justified? We use contingent valuation to determine the economic value of improving the welfare of farm animals and find that people are willing to pay extra on their weekly food bill to ensure that laying hens, broiler chickens dairy cows and pigs have improved welfare conditions. The benefits of improving animal welfare are shown to exceed the costs of implementing these schemes. We conclude that improving the standards of legislation for farm animal welfare so that all farm animals experience higher standards of welfare can be economically justified.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The relative value of farm animal welfare
    Chilton, Susan M.
    Burgess, Diane
    Hutchinson, W. George
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 59 (03) : 353 - 363
  • [22] THE VALUE OF FARM ANIMAL-WELFARE
    BENNETT, R
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 46 (01) : 46 - 60
  • [23] Do Farm Animals Have Feelings?
    Neethirajan, Suresh
    Resource: Engineering and Technology for Sustainable World, 2021, 28 (03): : 4 - 7
  • [24] WELFARE Research into the abuse of animals and people
    Tiplady, Catherine
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2011, 169 (07) : 188 - 188
  • [26] Animal welfare in husbandry, transport and slaughter of farm animals
    Troeger, K
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1996, 76 (12): : 1222 - &
  • [27] Consumers perceptions about the welfare of farm animals in Colombia
    Garcia Castro, Fredy E.
    Medrano-Galarza, Catalina
    Cubides-Cardenas, Jaime A.
    Zuniga Lopez, Aldemar
    Ahumada-Beltran, Diego G.
    AGRONOMIA MESOAMERICANA, 2023, 34 (01):
  • [28] Welfare benefits to farm animals from their use in research
    Colditz, IG
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2004, 32 : 235 - 240
  • [29] Role of oxytocin in improving the welfare of farm animals - A review
    Chen, Siyu
    Sato, Shusuke
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 30 (04): : 449 - 454
  • [30] Halal slaughtering, welfare, and empathy in farm animals: a review
    Rajwali Khan
    Hongfang Guo
    Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza
    Abdur Rahman
    Muhammad Ayaz
    Zan Linsen
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2018, 50 : 1733 - 1738