Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Caesarean Section: A Case-Control Study of Post discharge Surveillance

被引:14
|
作者
Griffiths, Jill [1 ]
Demianczuk, Nestor [2 ]
Cordoviz, Melody [3 ]
Joffe, A. Mark [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Royal Alexandra Hosp, Infect Prevent Serv, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Div Infect Dis, Dept Internal Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Caesarean section; elective; antibiotic prophylaxis; surgical site infection;
D O I
10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30460-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To ascertain the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) following elective Caesarean section (CS) and to compare demographie characteristics and antibiotic administration between infected cases and noninfected control subjects. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing elective CS between 1996 and 2002 at a tertiary centre. Infection-control personnel attempted to contact by telephone all women who had had Caesarean sections, 1 month after their surgery. The women they reached were asked to complete a questionnaire based on CDC-validated criteria for infection to determine whether S81 had occurred. Control subjects without SSI were matched on the basis of having had an elective CS and by date of surgery. We then reviewed the hospital records of both groups. Results: Over the study period, 1250 elective Caesarean sections were performed and 124 infected cases were identified, giving an overall SSI incidence of 9.9%. Of the 342 women reviewed (124 cases, 218 control subjects), 23% received prophylactic intraoperative antibiotics. Cases and control subjects differed significantly in terms of estimated blood loss, with fewer control subjects having excessive blood loss (P = 0.04). Among those women receiving postoperative antibiotics, case subjects received a significantly higher number of doses than did control subjects (P = 0.003). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of overall antibiotic administration or other demographic variables. Conclusions: The incidence of SSI following elective CS according to postdischarge surveillance was 9.9%, which is higher than expected for a low-risk procedure. Because follow-up was not possible for all cases, this incidence may be an underestimate. Underuse of antimicrobial prophylaxis mayaiso be a contributing factor, because prophylactic antibiotics were administered in less than 25% of cases.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 344
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health insurance database for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection following arthroplasty
    Le Meur, N.
    Grammatico-Guillon, L.
    Wang, S.
    Astagneau, P.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2016, 92 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [22] Post-caesarean section surgical site infection: rate and risk factors
    Ghuman, Marcus
    Rohlandt, Deirdre
    Joshy, Grace
    Lawrenson, Ross
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (1339) : 32 - 36
  • [23] Post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance in a hospital in Brazil
    Oliveira, Adriana C.
    Lima, Elenice D. R. P.
    Lima, Alexandre de Paula
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (02): : 266 - 268
  • [24] Post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance by automated telephony
    McNeish, J.
    Lyle, D.
    McCowan, M.
    Emmerson, S.
    McAuley, S.
    Reilly, J.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 66 (03) : 232 - 236
  • [25] Digital tools for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection
    Dalcol, Camila
    Tanner, Judith
    Poveda, Vanessa de Brito
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (01) : 96 - 109
  • [26] Readmissions for surgical site infections following caesarean section
    El-Achi, Vanessa
    Wan, King Man
    Brown, James
    Marshall, Drew
    McGee, Therese
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 (05): : 582 - 585
  • [27] What gets measured gets noticed. Tracking surgical site infection post caesarean section through community surveillance: A post intervention study protocol
    Ohr, Se Ok
    Giles, Michelle
    Munnoch, Sally
    Hunter, Mandy
    Bolte, Michelle
    Ferguson, John
    Deane, Jeffrey
    Cashman, Patrick
    Foureur, Maralyn
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (05) : 2530 - 2538
  • [28] Adherence to best practice: Preventing surgical site infection following caesarean section in Australia
    Martin, Elizabeth
    Beckmann, Michael
    Blythe, Robin
    Merollini, Katharina
    Graves, Nicholas
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 61 (05): : 728 - 734
  • [29] SURGICAL SITE INFECTION FOLLOWING LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
    Kondakasseril, Nishi Roshini
    Hiran, Nishitha
    Andrews, Andrews Mekkattukunnel
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (24): : 1306 - 1309
  • [30] Caesarean section and asthma in Malaysian children: a case-control study
    Nathan, Anna Marie
    de Bruyne, Jessie
    Khalid, Farah
    Arumugam, Kulantheran
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (03): : 204 - 208