ANIMAL WELL-BEING IN PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH

被引:6
|
作者
HAMMOND, AC
机构
[1] Subtropical Agricultural Research Station, USDA, Brooksville, 34605-0046., FL
关键词
ANIMAL RESEARCH; TESTING; ANIMAL WELFARE; BIOETHICS; PHARMACOLOGY; TOXICOLOGY;
D O I
10.2527/1994.722523x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The primary objective of this paper is to heighten the awareness of animal welfare issues among animal scientists. Emphasis is placed on issues relating to pharmacology and toxicology research with animals. Use of both laboratory animals and farm animals is addressed; major consideration is given to domestic livestock. Animal welfare issues are complex and have philosophical, ethical, legal, societal, scientific, and biological bases and implications. There is substantial diversity in public opinion and perception regarding use of animals in research, including the belief among some people that use of animals in research should be eliminated altogether. Increasingly, public opinion is tending toward expectations of alternatives to the use of live animals for research. From an animal scientist's viewpoint, although the availability and development of viable alternatives are increasing, live animal research in pharmacology and toxicology currently has no acceptable alternative, in many cases because of the complex interactions involved in whole-animal (biological) systems. Compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and policies requires animal scientists to use only appropriate species for research, use the minimum number of animals needed, minimize pain and discomfort, and consider alternatives to the use of live animals. In summary, it is essential that animal scientists be advocates of animal well-being and adhere to appropriate guidelines for animal care and use when conducting research with animals.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 527
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advances in subjective well-being research
    Diener, Ed
    Oishi, Shigehiro
    Tay, Louis
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 2 (04): : 253 - 260
  • [42] PRIMATE RESEARCH AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
    BOWDEN, DM
    SCIENCE, 1988, 240 (4848) : 12 - 12
  • [43] Research on Consumer Well-Being in Malaysia
    Paim, Laily
    Masud, Jariah
    Haron, Sharifah
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2012, 33 (02) : 227 - 230
  • [44] Well-Being: Psychological Research for Philosophers
    Tiberius, Valerie
    PHILOSOPHY COMPASS, 2006, 1 (05): : 493 - 505
  • [45] Advances in subjective well-being research
    Ed Diener
    Shigehiro Oishi
    Louis Tay
    Nature Human Behaviour, 2018, 2 : 253 - 260
  • [46] Subjective well-being is essential to well-being
    Diener, E
    Sapyta, JJ
    Suh, E
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1998, 9 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [47] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING - COMPONENTS OF WELL-BEING
    GLATZER, W
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1987, 19 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [48] Existential Well-Being Spirituality or Well-Being?
    Visser, Anja
    Garssen, Bert
    Vingerhoets, Ad J. J. M.
    JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2017, 205 (03) : 234 - 241
  • [49] Nutrition plus environmental enrichment = animal well-being
    Diaz, ML
    Zabala, R
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AZA NUTRITION ADVISORY GROUP FOURTH CONFERENCE ON ZOO AND WILDLIFE NUTRITION, 2001, : 63 - 65
  • [50] Wild Animal Ethics: Well-Being, Agency, and Freedom
    Nicolas Delon
    Philosophia, 2022, 50 : 875 - 885