USABILITY TESTING ON A BUDGET - A NASA USABILITY TEST-CASE STUDY

被引:3
|
作者
SZCZUR, M
机构
[1] National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA), Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01449299408914589
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Okay, so you've purchased a graphical user interface (GUI) builder tool to help you quickly build a sophisticated user interface, and your developers promise to follow a particular style guide (e.g., OSF/Motif, Apple/Macintosh) when creating the GUI. This is definitely a step in the right direction, but it is no guarantee that the application's user interface will be usable; that is, where the user interface helps, rather than hinders, the end-users from doing their jobs. Numerous techniques for testing the usability and user satisfaction of an application's GUI are available, such as design walk-throughs, field testing with beta releases, demonstrations of prototypes to future end-users, and user questionnaires. One of the most effective techniques is usability testing with defined tasks and metrics, and yet, it is not commonly used in project development life cycles at the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA). This paper discusses a low-budget, but effective, approach we used at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) to perform structured usability testing. It did not require any additional staff or a usability laboratory, but did successfully identify problems with the application's user interface. The purpose of the usability testing was two-fold: (1) to test the process used in the usability test; and (2) to apply the results of the test to improving the subject software's user interface. This paper will discuss the results from the test and the lessons learned. It will conclude with a discussion of future plans to conduct cost benefit analysis and integrate usability testing as a required step in a project's development life cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 118
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Case Study of Usability Testing Methodology on Mobile Learning Course
    Li, Qing
    Wang, Tao
    Wang, Jing
    Li, Yun
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE AND AWARENESS INTERNET, IET AIAI2011, 2011, : 408 - 412
  • [22] Usability Testing Practice at MIMOS Usability Lab
    Abdollah, Norfarhana
    Sivaji, Ashok
    Ghazali, Masitah
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT 2015, PT IV, 2015, 9299 : 628 - 629
  • [23] Cultural usability: The effects of culture on usability testing
    Shi, Qingxin
    Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2007, Pt 2, Proceedings, 2007, 4663 : 611 - 616
  • [24] Test-Case Prioritization for Configuration Testing
    Cheng, Runxiang
    Zhang, Lingming
    Marinov, Darko
    Xu, Tianyin
    ISSTA '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH ACM SIGSOFT INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE TESTING AND ANALYSIS, 2021, : 452 - 465
  • [25] Speech Impact in a Usability Test - A Case Study of the KUBO Robot
    Christiansen, Caroline Gjerlund
    Hardt, Sidsel
    Jensen, Stine Falgren
    Fischer, Kerstin
    Palinko, Oskar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI '22), 2022, : 723 - 726
  • [26] A study of the evaluator effect in usability testing
    Hornbaek, Kasper
    Frokjaer, Erik
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2008, 23 (03): : 251 - 277
  • [27] Usability testing: A review and an investigative study
    Dhillon, B. S.
    Twelfth ISSAT International Conference Reliability and Quality in Design, Proceedings, 2006, : 36 - 41
  • [28] Designing for usability: A case study
    Wesson, J
    deKock, G
    Warren, P
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT '97, 1997, : 31 - 38
  • [29] iKnow Usability: A Case Study
    Guseva, Ana
    Gusev, Marjan
    Chorbev, Ivan
    2016 24TH TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM (TELFOR), 2016, : 810 - 813
  • [30] Usability progression: Making smart choices in usability testing
    Ramey, J
    45TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGINATION, INNOVATION AND COMMUNICATION, 1998, : 372 - 374