USABILITY TESTING ON A BUDGET - A NASA USABILITY TEST-CASE STUDY

被引:3
|
作者
SZCZUR, M
机构
[1] National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA), Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01449299408914589
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Okay, so you've purchased a graphical user interface (GUI) builder tool to help you quickly build a sophisticated user interface, and your developers promise to follow a particular style guide (e.g., OSF/Motif, Apple/Macintosh) when creating the GUI. This is definitely a step in the right direction, but it is no guarantee that the application's user interface will be usable; that is, where the user interface helps, rather than hinders, the end-users from doing their jobs. Numerous techniques for testing the usability and user satisfaction of an application's GUI are available, such as design walk-throughs, field testing with beta releases, demonstrations of prototypes to future end-users, and user questionnaires. One of the most effective techniques is usability testing with defined tasks and metrics, and yet, it is not commonly used in project development life cycles at the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA). This paper discusses a low-budget, but effective, approach we used at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) to perform structured usability testing. It did not require any additional staff or a usability laboratory, but did successfully identify problems with the application's user interface. The purpose of the usability testing was two-fold: (1) to test the process used in the usability test; and (2) to apply the results of the test to improving the subject software's user interface. This paper will discuss the results from the test and the lessons learned. It will conclude with a discussion of future plans to conduct cost benefit analysis and integrate usability testing as a required step in a project's development life cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 118
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Usability testing: A case study
    Chisman, J
    Diller, K
    Walbridge, S
    COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 1999, 60 (06): : 552 - 569
  • [2] Usability testing of a metasearch interface: A case study
    Wrubel, Laura
    Schmidt, Kari
    COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2007, 68 (04): : 292 - 311
  • [3] Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing: Case Study
    Eksioglu, Mahmut
    Kiris, Esin
    Capar, Burak
    Selcuk, Murat N.
    Ouzeir, Selen
    INTERNATIONALIZATION, DESIGN AND GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 6775 : 143 - +
  • [4] Creative low-budget usability testing methods
    Reilly, MT
    Hogan, CN
    STC's 52nd Annual Conference Proceedings: EXPERIENCING TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2005, : 225 - 230
  • [5] Usability testing for telemedicine systems: A methodology and case study
    BirkmirePeters, DP
    Whitaker, LA
    Peters, LJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 41ST ANNUAL MEETING, 1997, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 792 - 796
  • [6] Usability Testing for Greater Impact: A Primo Case Study
    Perrin, Joy Marie
    Clark, Melanie
    De-Leon, Esther
    Edgar, Lynne
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND LIBRARIES, 2014, 33 (04) : 57 - 66
  • [7] Redesigning subject guides with usability testing: a case study
    Chan, Christopher
    Gu, Jennifer
    Lei, Chloe
    JOURNAL OF WEB LIBRARIANSHIP, 2019, 13 (03) : 260 - 279
  • [8] A Case Study on Reliability and Usability Testing of a Web Portal
    Ali-Shahid, Malik Muhammad
    Sulaiman, Shahida
    2015 9TH MALAYSIAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (MYSEC2015), 2015, : 31 - 36
  • [9] Usability Evaluation Using Unmoderated Remote Usability Testing on Angkasa LMS Website Case Study
    Effendy, Veronikha
    Kusumo, Dana Sulistiyo
    Selviandro, Nungki
    Laksitowening, Kusuma Ayu
    PROCEEDINGS OF SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ICICT 2022, VOL 1, 2023, 447 : 761 - 769
  • [10] Distributing usability - The implications for usability testing
    Vrazalic, L
    CONSTRUCTING THE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE KNOWLEGE ECONOMY: METHODS AND TOOLS, THEORY AND STRUCTURE, 2004, : 341 - 353