EFFECT OF AGE AND ASTIGMATISM ON THE AMO ARRAY MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS

被引:35
|
作者
JACOBI, PC
KONEN, W
机构
来源
关键词
AGE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEGRADATION OF IMAGE; GLARE; MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS; PSEUDOACCOMMODATION;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80217-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) have been designed to provide better uncorrected near visual acuity than monofocal IOLs, However, the increase in depth of focus is combined with a significant decrease in contrast sensitivity and glare. We implanted a new zonal-progressive MIOL (AMO Array) in 31 eyes of 25 patients whose mean age was 60.8 +/- 13.5 years. At 12.1 +/- 2.4 months postoperatively, the uncorrected visual acuity averaged 0.56 +/- 0.09 (20/32) for distance and 0.54 +/- 0.12 (20/40) for near focus, Seventy-five percent of patients achieved a best corrected distance visual acuity of greater than or equal to 0.9 (20/22). With distance correction only, mean near visual acuity was 0.72 +/- 0.17 (20/25). Best corrected near acuity reached 0.89 +/- 0.11 (20/22), requiring an additional near add of +1.0 to +2.0 diopters (D). We observed an age-dependent difference in the depth of focus. In younger patients (46 +/- 6 years), the pseudoaccommodation range was 6.25 D; acuity attained was greater than or equal to 0.4 (20/50). In older patients (71 +/- 7 years), visual acuity at the near focus was substantially reduced (two lines). Regan contrast sensitivity was lower for MIOL patients at all contrast levels, but the difference was statistically significant only at very low contrast (11%), Contrast sensitivity and glare were dependent on the patient's age but did not change with the amount of postoperative astigmatism, Younger patients were very satisfied with the results of MIOL implantation, and the small loss of contrast sensitivity was counterbalanced by the advantage of improved depth of focus and uncorrected near visual acuity.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 561
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE CHOICE OF AN INTRAOCULAR-LENS
    PERCIVAL, SPB
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1983, 61 (04): : 678 - 679
  • [32] A MODEL INTRAOCULAR-LENS
    WASSERMAN, EL
    SHEETS, JH
    ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1987, 19 (10): : 385 - 387
  • [33] Visual properties of the foldable Array multifocal intraocular lens
    Weghaupt, H
    Pieh, S
    Skorpik, C
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 : 1313 - 1317
  • [34] Characterization of visual phenomena with the Array multifocal intraocular lens
    Hunkeler, JD
    Coffman, TM
    Paugh, J
    Lang, A
    Smith, P
    Tarantino, N
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (07): : 1195 - 1204
  • [35] INTRAOCULAR-LENS IMPLANTATION
    不详
    CONNECTICUT MEDICINE, 1980, 44 (08) : 507 - 510
  • [36] SUPERREVERSED INTRAOCULAR-LENS
    FECHNER, PU
    TRIER, HG
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (04): : 471 - 476
  • [37] INTRAOCULAR-LENS DATA
    COLENBRANDER, A
    WOODS, LV
    STAMPER, RL
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1986, 93 (09) : 37 - 46
  • [38] INTRAOCULAR-LENS COMPLICATIONS
    LORUSSO, V
    MORAMARCO, A
    PACELLA, E
    BALACCOGABRIELI, C
    ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 22 (10): : 377 - 381
  • [39] INTRAOCULAR-LENS BIOCOMPATIBILITY
    APPLE, DJ
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 18 (03): : 217 - 218
  • [40] INTRAOCULAR-LENS IMPLANTATION
    REDMOND, MR
    JOURNAL OF THE FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 67 (05): : 492 - 493