The relation between intellectual capital and intangible assets of pharmaceutical companies

被引:26
|
作者
Boekestein, Bram [1 ]
机构
[1] KIQ, Malden, Netherlands
关键词
Intangible assets; Intellectual capital; Pharmaceuticals industry; Annual reports; Goodwill accounting;
D O I
10.1108/14691930610661881
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this research is to assess the visibility of intangible assets on the balance-sheet of pharmaceutical companies. Further, how these assets overlap with intellectual capital and whether a relation can be established between intangible assets and company performance. Design/methodology/approach - Intangible assets reporting practices of a group of 52 globally operating pharmaceutical companies are analysed. These assets are related to intellectual capital definitions and company performance. Findings - Results indicate that the majority of companies are specifying intangible assets and that a considerable overlap occurs with intellectual capital. Intangible assets may constitute substantially to the companies' assets. However, clear relations of intangible assets with company performance could not be established. Practical implications - Imperfections in the reporting of intangible assets are observed. These are the non-uniformity of generally agreed accounting principles and practice around the world, the specification of goodwill and the position of R&D. A number of proposals are put forward to improve the visibility of intangible assets and to bring these in line with intellectual capital definitions. Originality/value - The value of the paper can be found in the approach to fulfil the ideal of intellectual capital valuation through the more practical way of intangible asset specification on the balance-sheet. For the group of companies studied, this paper assesses the situation in 2003 and the way ahead to further improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intellectual property - valuable intangible assets of the organization
    Walczak, Waldemar
    E-MENTOR, 2011, (02): : 14 - 23
  • [32] Towards a culture of sharing and exchange: Investing in the intangible assets and intellectual capital for the leveraging of collaborative networks
    Roberts, Bob
    Koumpis, Adamantios
    NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATION AND SUPPORTING FRAMEWORKS, 2006, 224 : 69 - +
  • [33] Voluntary and mandatory disclosure of intellectual capital or intangible assets in Latin America. A literature review
    Veldsquez, Gloria Stella Mesa
    CONTADURIA UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA, 2021, 79 : 253 - 274
  • [34] Intangible assets valuation in the Malaysian capital market
    Salamudin, Norhana
    Bakar, Ridzwan
    Ibrahim, Muhd Kamil
    Hassan, Faridah Haji
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2010, 11 (03) : 391 - +
  • [35] Intangible capital in the pharmaceutical and chemical industry
    Gleason, Katherine I.
    Klock, Mark
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2006, 46 (02): : 300 - 314
  • [36] The impact of intangible assets on the value of FMCG companies worldwide
    Azamat, Kashkinbayev
    Galiya, Jaxybekova
    Bezhan, Rustamov
    Nurdana, Zhaishylyk
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2023, 8 (01):
  • [37] DISCLOSURE OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS INFORMATION IN BRAZILIAN TRADED COMPANIES
    Mazzioni, Sady
    Di Domenico, Daniela
    Bedin, Hevelyn Nunes
    REVISTA GEINTEC-GESTAO INOVACAO E TECNOLOGIAS, 2014, 4 (05): : 1501 - 1520
  • [38] Determinants of Intangible Assets Disclosure in Quoted Companies in Nigeria
    Ibadin, Peter Okoeguale
    Oladipupo, Olugoke Adesina
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND GOVERNANCE, 2015, 6 : 13 - 25
  • [39] THE IMPACT OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF CROATIAN COMPANIES
    Bubic, Jasenka
    Susak, Toni
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT: 9TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, 2015, : 462 - 468
  • [40] Value creation in Russian companies: The role of intangible assets
    Garanina, Tatiana
    Volkov, Dmitry
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, 2007, : 143 - 152