EFFICIENT INVERSION OF MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA IN 2 DIMENSIONS

被引:18
|
作者
OLDENBURG, DW
ELLIS, RG
机构
[1] UBC-Geophysical Inversion Facility, Department of Geophysics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0031-9201(93)90130-2
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Two algorithms are presented to invert magnetotelluric data over 2D conductivity structures. Both algorithms use approximate sensitivities that arise from the 1D conductivity profile beneath each station; this avoids the large computations normally required to calculate the true 2D sensitivities. The first algorithm produces 'blocky' models by minimizing the l(1), norm of the conductivity, whereas the second algorithm produces smoother models by minimizing the l(2), norm of the model. The inversion of a large matrix in the l(2), norm minimization is obviated by using a sub-space solution. Our presentation is motivated by three goals. The first is to provide details of these algorithms and to show their efficiency compared with more commonly used techniques. The second goal is to illustrate the non-uniqueness inherent in these inversions and to illuminate the importance of choice of norm that is minimized. To accomplish this we perform l(1) and l(2) norm inversions on a synthetic model. The third goal is to show the utility, the practical importance, and the limitations of inverting determinant average data. The utility is demonstrated by the similarity that is often observed when comparing the inversion result obtained by inverting transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) mode data jointly with that obtained from inverting determinant average data. The importance of inverting determinant average data in field experiments arises because determinant average data are insensitive to rotations of the impedance matrix and perhaps other artefacts of processing the data. The limitations are shown by the loss of resolution in the model obtained by inverting the determinant average data compared with joint inversion of TE and TM modes. We illustrate our algorithms by inverting synthetic data and the COPROD2 data set.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 200
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bonjol Geothermal Structure Based on 2D Inversion of Magnetotelluric Data
    Joni, Wiwid
    Hermawan, Dudi
    ITB INTERNATIONAL GEOTHERMAL WORKSHOP, 2020, 417
  • [22] Inversion of magnetotelluric data for 2D structure with sharp resistivity contrasts
    de Groot-Hedlin, C
    Constable, S
    GEOPHYSICS, 2004, 69 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [23] 2D inversion of magnetotelluric data using deep learning technology
    Liao, Xiaolong
    Shi, Zeyu
    Zhang, Zhihou
    Yan, Qixiang
    Liu, Pengfei
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2022, 70 (03) : 1047 - 1060
  • [24] Application of supervised descent method for 2D magnetotelluric data inversion
    Guo, Rui
    Li, Maokun
    Yang, Fan
    Xu, Shenheng
    Abubakar, Aria
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (04) : WA53 - WA65
  • [25] INVERSION OF COPROD2 MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA BY USE OF ABIC MINIMIZATION METHOD
    UCHIDA, T
    JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1993, 45 (09): : 1063 - 1071
  • [26] RAPID INVERSION OF 2-DIMENSIONAL AND 3-DIMENSIONAL MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA
    SMITH, JT
    BOOKER, JR
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1991, 96 (B3): : 3905 - 3922
  • [27] Regularized Inversion for Three-dimensional Magnetotelluric Data
    Tong Xiaozhong
    Liu Jianxin
    Guo Rongwen
    Zhang Lianwei
    NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, 2012, : 103 - 109
  • [28] Semiautomatic and Automatic Cooperative Inversion of Seismic and Magnetotelluric Data
    Cuong V. A. Le
    Brett D. Harris
    Andrew M. Pethick
    Eric M. Takam Takougang
    Brendan Howe
    Surveys in Geophysics, 2016, 37 : 845 - 896
  • [29] Optimal selection of regularization parameter in magnetotelluric data inversion
    Aref Zainalpour
    Gholamreza Kamali
    Ali Moradzadeh
    Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2022, 57 : 245 - 263
  • [30] DIRECT INVERSION OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA
    COEN, S
    GEOPHYSICS, 1981, 46 (04) : 460 - 460