Intrapartum care quality indicators: a literature review

被引:11
|
作者
Lazzaretto, Elisa [1 ]
Nespoli, Antonella [2 ]
Fumagalli, Simona [3 ]
Colciago, Elisabetta [4 ]
Perego, Sofia [2 ]
Locatelli, Anna [5 ]
机构
[1] ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Dept Matern, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, FBBM Monza, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Ctr Biostat Clin Epidemiol, Monza, Monza Brianza, Italy
[5] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Unit Mother & Child, ASST Vimercate, Milan, Italy
来源
MINERVA GINECOLOGICA | 2018年 / 70卷 / 03期
关键词
Quality indicators; health care; Midwifery; Maternal-child nursing;
D O I
10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04177-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Quality of care is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of the maternal and newborn health, mainly with respect to care around labor and delivery and in the immediate postnatal period. The aim of this review was to identify the recommended intrapartum care indicators in order to measure the quality of midwifery care. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A structured literature search was conducted in August 2017 incorporating English and Italian language studies from 1993 and onwards to identify published articles on quality standards of intrapartum care. Research was performed into the area of enquiry in electronic database (Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Trip) and in relevant midwifery websites. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 369 quality indicators to measure the intrapartum care. Following a systematic process that allows to classify all indicators in domains and categories, we analyzed 268 outcome and process indicators specifically designated to monitor the intrapartum care in a low risk population. Through the identification of further exclusion criteria and semantic analogies we obtained 80 final quality indicators (39 outcome indicators and 41 process indicators). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 80 indicators that should be used to measure the quality of low risk intrapartum care. Although the majority of indicators we could monitor through hospital databases and the Italian Birth Register-CeDAP are outcome indicators, it is important to give attention also to process indicators that measure the activities performed and whether or not they are evidence-based. For a low risk population they could measure adherence with guidelines that promote and support the normality of the process.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 355
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality indicators for schizophrenia care: A scoping review
    Anderson, Jennifer C.
    Seitz, Dallas P.
    Crockford, David
    Addington, Donald
    Baek, Hanji
    Lorenzetti, Diane L.
    Barry, Rebecca
    Bolton, James M.
    Taylor, Valerie H.
    Kurdyak, Paul
    Kirkham, Julia
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2024, 274 : 406 - 416
  • [22] Quality Indicators for Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Pasman, H. Roeline W.
    Brandt, Hella E.
    Deliens, Luc
    Francke, Anneke L.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2009, 38 (01) : 145 - 156
  • [23] Nursing sensitive quality indicators for nursing home care: International review of literature, policy and practice
    Nakrem, Sigrid
    Vinsnes, Anne Guttormsen
    Harkless, Gene E.
    Paulsen, Bard
    Seim, Arnfinn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2009, 46 (06) : 848 - 857
  • [24] Relation Between Quality-of-Care Indicators for Diabetes and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review
    Sidorenkov, Grigory
    Haaijer-Ruskamp, Flora M.
    de Zeeuw, Dick
    Bilo, Henk
    Denig, Petra
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2011, 68 (03) : 263 - 289
  • [25] A Literature Review and Assessment of Lung Cancer Quality Indicators
    Chiew, K.
    Jalaludin, B.
    Sundaresan, P.
    Vinod, S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S993 - S993
  • [26] Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe definition of quality indicators for pharmaceutical care: a systematic literature review and international consensus development
    Fujita, Kenji
    Halvorsen, Kjell H.
    Sato, Noriko
    Jazbar, Janja
    Modamio, Pilar
    Waltering, Isabel
    De Wulf, Isabelle
    Westerlund, Tommy
    Chen, Timothy F.
    Teichert, Martina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 46 (01) : 70 - 79
  • [27] Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe definition of quality indicators for pharmaceutical care: a systematic literature review and international consensus development
    Kenji Fujita
    Kjell H. Halvorsen
    Noriko Sato
    Janja Jazbar
    Pilar Modamio
    Isabel Waltering
    Isabelle De Wulf
    Tommy Westerlund
    Timothy F. Chen
    Martina Teichert
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2024, 46 : 70 - 79
  • [28] Quality Indicators in Surgical Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Lee, Katherine C.
    Sokas, Claire M.
    Streid, Jocelyn
    Senglaub, Steven S.
    Coogan, Kathleen
    Walling, Anne M.
    Cooper, Zara
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 62 (03) : 545 - 558
  • [29] Quality indicators for breast cancer care: A systematic review
    Maes-Carballo, Marta
    Gomez-Fandino, Yolanda
    Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla
    Estrada-Lopez, Carlos Roberto
    Martin-Diaz, Manuel
    Khan, Khalid Saeed
    Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
    BREAST, 2021, 59 : 221 - 231
  • [30] Quality Indicators for Palliative Care: Update of a Systematic Review
    De Roo, Maaike L.
    Leemans, Kathleen
    Claessen, Susanne J. J.
    Cohen, Joachim
    Pasman, H. Roeline W.
    Deliens, Luc
    Francke, Anneke L.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 46 (04) : 556 - 572